1. Academic Validation
  2. Arylsulfonamide 64B Inhibits Hypoxia/HIF-Induced Expression of c-Met and CXCR4 and Reduces Primary Tumor Growth and Metastasis of Uveal Melanoma

Arylsulfonamide 64B Inhibits Hypoxia/HIF-Induced Expression of c-Met and CXCR4 and Reduces Primary Tumor Growth and Metastasis of Uveal Melanoma

  • Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Apr 1;25(7):2206-2218. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1368.
Lei Dong 1 Shuo You 1 Qing Zhang 2 Satoru Osuka 1 Narra S Devi 1 Stefan Kaluz 1 3 Jalisa H Ferguson 4 Hua Yang 2 Guoliang Chen 5 Binghe Wang 3 4 Hans E Grossniklaus 2 3 Erwin G Van Meir 6 3 7
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • 2 Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • 3 Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • 4 Department of Chemistry, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • 5 Key Laboratory of Structure-Based Drugs Design and Discovery of Ministry of Education, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, PR China.
  • 6 Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia. [email protected].
  • 7 Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Abstract

Purpose: Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most prevalent and lethal intraocular malignancy in adults. Here, we examined the importance of hypoxia in UM growth and tested the antitumor effects of arylsulfonamide 64B, an inhibitor of the hypoxia-induced factor (HIF) pathway in animal models of UM and investigated the related mechanisms.

Experimental design: UM cells were implanted in the uvea of mice eyes and mice systemically treated with 64B. Drug effect on primary eye tumor growth, circulating tumor cells, metastasis formation in liver, and survival were examined. 64B effects on UM cell growth, invasion and hypoxia-induced expression of C-X-C Chemokine Receptor type 4 (CXCR4) and mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (c-Met) were measured. Luciferase reporter assays, chromatin immunoprecipitation, co-immunoprecipitation, and cellular thermal shift assays were used to determine how 64B interferes with the HIF transcriptional complex.

Results: Systemic administration of 64B had potent antitumor effects against UM in several orthotopic mouse models, suppressing UM growth in the eye (∼70% reduction) and spontaneous liver metastasis (∼50% reduction), and extending mice survival (P < 0.001) while being well tolerated. 64B inhibited hypoxia-induced expression of CXCR4 and c-Met, 2 key drivers of tumor invasion and metastasis. 64B disrupted the HIF-1 complex by interfering with HIF-1α binding to p300/CBP co-factors, thus reducing p300 recruitment to the MET and CXCR4 gene promoters. 64B could thermostabilize p300, supporting direct 64B binding to p300.

Conclusions: Our preclinical efficacy studies support the further optimization of the 64B chemical scaffold toward a clinical candidate for the treatment of UM.

Figures
Products