1. Academic Validation
  2. Role of 53BP1 in end protection and DNA synthesis at DNA breaks

Role of 53BP1 in end protection and DNA synthesis at DNA breaks

  • Genes Dev. 2021 Oct 1;35(19-20):1356-1367. doi: 10.1101/gad.348667.121.
Jacob Paiano  # 1 Nicholas Zolnerowich  # 1 Wei Wu 1 Raphael Pavani 1 Chen Wang 2 Hongzhi Li 2 3 Li Zheng 2 3 Binghui Shen 2 3 Barry P Sleckman 4 5 Bo-Ruei Chen 4 5 André Nussenzweig 1
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Laboratory of Genome Integrity, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA.
  • 2 Department of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, California 91010, USA.
  • 3 Department of Molecular Medicine, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, California 91010, USA.
  • 4 Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA.
  • 5 O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294, USA.
  • # Contributed equally.
Abstract

Double-strand break (DSB) repair choice is greatly influenced by the initial processing of DNA ends. 53BP1 limits the formation of recombinogenic single-strand DNA (ssDNA) in BRCA1-deficient cells, leading to defects in homologous recombination (HR). However, the exact mechanisms by which 53BP1 inhibits DSB resection remain unclear. Previous studies have identified two potential pathways: protection against DNA2/EXO1 exonucleases presumably through the Shieldin (SHLD) complex binding to ssDNA, and localized DNA synthesis through the CTC1-STN1-TEN1 (CST) and DNA polymerase α (Polα) to counteract resection. Using a combinatorial approach of END-seq, SAR-seq, and RPA ChIP-seq, we directly assessed the extent of resection, DNA synthesis, and ssDNA, respectively, at restriction enzyme-induced DSBs. We show that, in the presence of 53BP1, Polα-dependent DNA synthesis reduces the fraction of resected DSBs and the resection lengths in G0/G1, supporting a previous model that fill-in synthesis can limit the extent of resection. However, in the absence of 53BP1, Polα activity is sustained on ssDNA yet does not substantially counter resection. In contrast, EXO1 nuclease activity is essential for hyperresection in the absence of 53BP1. Thus, Polα-mediated fill-in partially limits resection in the presence of 53BP1 but cannot counter extensive hyperresection due to the loss of 53BP1 exonuclease blockade. These data provide the first nucleotide mapping of DNA synthesis at resected DSBs and provide insight into the relationship between fill-in polymerases and resection exonucleases.

Keywords

53BP1; end resection; homologous recombination.

Figures
Products