1. Academic Validation
  2. Reciprocal modulation of anti-IgE induced histamine release from human mast cells by A₁ and A(2B) adenosine receptors

Reciprocal modulation of anti-IgE induced histamine release from human mast cells by A₁ and A(2B) adenosine receptors

  • Br J Pharmacol. 2011 Sep;164(2b):807-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01446.x.
K H Yip 1 H Y A Lau H Wise
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Abstract

Background and purpose: Adenosine is believed to participate in the pathological development of asthma through a mast cell-dependent mechanism. Our study aimed to pharmacologically characterize the functions of Adenosine Receptor (AR) subtypes (A₁, A(2A) , A(2B) and A₃) in primary human cultured mast cells (HCMC).

Experimental approach: HCMC were derived from progenitor stem cells in buffy coat and the effects of Adenosine Receptor ligands on basal and IgE-dependent histamine release were evaluated.

Key results: Adenosine and analogues alone did not induce HCMC degranulation. When HCMC were activated by anti-IgE after 10 min pre-incubation with adenosine, a biphasic effect on histamine release was observed with enhancement of HCMC activation at low concentrations of adenosine (10⁻⁹-10⁻⁷ mol·L⁻¹) and inhibition at higher concentrations (10⁻⁶-10⁻⁴ mol·L⁻¹). The potentiating action was mimicked by A₁ AR agonists CCPA and 2'MeCCPA, and inhibited by the A₁ AR antagonist PSB36. In contrast, the inhibitory action of adenosine was mimicked by the non-specific A₂ AR agonist CV1808 and attenuated by A(2B) AR antagonists PSB1115 and MRS1760. The non-selective AR antagonist CGS15943 attenuated both the potentiating and inhibitory actions.

Conclusions and implications: We have defined for the first time the contribution of A₁ and A(2B) ARs, respectively, to the potentiating and inhibitory action of adenosine on human mast cell activation. With reference to the current trend of developing novel anti-asthmatic agents from AR ligands, our results suggest that inhibition of human mast cell activation would be a mechanism for A₁ AR antagonists, but not A(2B) AR antagonists.

Figures
Products