1. Academic Validation
  2. Structure activity and molecular modeling analyses of ribose- and base-modified uridine 5'-triphosphate analogues at the human P2Y2 and P2Y4 receptors

Structure activity and molecular modeling analyses of ribose- and base-modified uridine 5'-triphosphate analogues at the human P2Y2 and P2Y4 receptors

  • Biochem Pharmacol. 2006 Feb 14;71(4):540-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2005.11.010.
Kenneth A Jacobson 1 Stefano Costanzi Andrei A Ivanov Susanna Tchilibon Pedro Besada Zhan-Guo Gao Savitri Maddileti T Kendall Harden
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 Molecular Recognition Section, Laboratory of Bioorganic Chemistry, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. [email protected]
Abstract

With the long-term goal of developing receptor subtype-selective high affinity agonists for the uracil nucleotide-activated P2Y receptors we have carried out a series of structure activity and molecular modeling studies of the human P2Y2 and P2Y4 receptors. UTP analogues with substitutions in the 2'-position of the ribose moiety retained capacity to activate both P2Y2 and P2Y4 receptors. Certain of these analogues were equieffective for activation of both receptors whereas 2'-amino-2'-deoxy-UTP exhibited higher potency for the P2Y2 receptor and 2'-azido-UTP exhibited higher potency for the P2Y4 receptor. 4-Thio substitution of the uracil base resulted in a UTP analogue with increased potency relative to UTP for activation of both the P2Y2 and P2Y4 receptors. In contrast, 2-thio substitution and halo- or alkyl substitution in the 5-position of the uracil base resulted in molecules that were 3-30-fold more potent at the P2Y2 receptor than P2Y4 receptor. 6-Aza-UTP was a P2Y2 Receptor Agonist that exhibited no activity at the P2Y4 receptor. Stereoisomers of UTPalphaS and 2'-deoxy-UTPalphaS were more potent at the P2Y2 than P2Y4 receptor, and the R-configuration was favored at both receptors. Molecular docking studies revealed that the binding mode of UTP is similar for both the P2Y2 and P2Y4 receptor binding pockets with the most prominent dissimilarities of the two receptors located in the second transmembrane domain (V90 in the P2Y2 receptor and I92 in the P2Y4 receptor) and the second extracellular loop (T182 in the P2Y2 receptor and L184 in the P2Y4 receptor). In summary, this work reveals substitutions in UTP that differentially affect agonist activity at P2Y2 versus P2Y4 receptors and in combination with molecular modeling studies should lead to chemical synthesis of new receptor subtype-selective drugs.

Figures
Products