2. Academic Validation
  3. Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study

Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study

  • Ann Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;29(11):2214-2222. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy405.
S Gadgeel 1,  S Peters 2,  T Mok 3,  A T Shaw 4,  D W Kim 5,  S I Ou 6,  M Pérol 7,  A Wrona 8,  S Novello 9,  R Rosell 10,  A Zeaiter 11,  T Liu 11,  E Nüesch 11,  B Balas 11,  D R Camidge 12
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Division of Hematology & Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • 2 Department of Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
  • 3 Department of Clinical Oncology, State Key Laboratory of South China, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
  • 4 Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
  • 5 Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
  • 6 Irvine School of Medicine, Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Orange, USA.
  • 7 Department of Medical Oncology, Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France.
  • 8 Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
  • 9 Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  • 10 Catalan Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain.
  • 11 F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
  • 12 Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, USA.
PMID: 30215676 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy405
Abstract

Background: The phase III ALEX study in patients with treatment-naive advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutation-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung Cancer (NSCLC) met its primary end point of improved progression-free survival (PFS) with alectinib versus crizotinib. Here, we present detailed central nervous system (CNS) efficacy data from ALEX.

Patients and methods: Overall, 303 patients aged ≥18 years underwent 1:1 randomization to receive twice-daily doses of alectinib 600 mg or crizotinib 250 mg. Brain imaging was conducted in all patients at baseline and every subsequent 8 weeks. End points (analyzed by subgroup: patients with/without baseline CNS metastases; patients with/without prior radiotherapy) included PFS, CNS objective response rate (ORR), and time to CNS progression.

Results: In total, 122 patients had Independent Review Committee-assessed baseline CNS metastases (alectinib, n = 64; crizotinib, n = 58), 43 had measurable lesions (alectinib, n = 21; crizotinib, n = 22), and 46 had received prior radiotherapy (alectinib, n = 25; crizotinib, n = 21). Investigator-assessed PFS with alectinib was consistent between patients with baseline CNS metastases [hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25-0.64] and those without (HR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33-0.80, P interaction = 0.36). Similar results were seen in patients regardless of prior radiotherapy. Time to CNS progression was significantly longer with alectinib versus crizotinib and comparable between patients with and without baseline CNS metastases (P < 0.0001). CNS ORR was 85.7% with alectinib versus 71.4% with crizotinib in patients who received prior radiotherapy and 78.6% versus 40.0%, respectively, in those who had not.

Conclusion: Alectinib demonstrated superior CNS activity and significantly delayed CNS progression versus crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advanced ALK+ NSCLC, irrespective of prior CNS disease or radiotherapy.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02075840.

Figures
Products