1. Academic Validation
  2. In vitro response of human breast cancer cell lines to the growth-inhibitory effects of styrylpyrone derivative (SPD) and assessment of its antiestrogenicity

In vitro response of human breast cancer cell lines to the growth-inhibitory effects of styrylpyrone derivative (SPD) and assessment of its antiestrogenicity

  • Anticancer Res. 1998 Nov-Dec;18(6A):4383-6.
A Hawariah 1 J Stanslas
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor D.E., Malaysia. [email protected]
PMID: 9891496
Abstract

Previous studies have shown that a styrylpyrone derivative (SPD) from a local tropical plant had antiprogestin and antiestrogenic effects in early pregnant mice models (Azimahtol et al. 1991). Antiprogestins and antiestrogens can be exploited as a therapeutic approach to breast Cancer treatment and thus the antitumor activity of SPD was tested in three different human breast Cancer cell lines that is: MCF- 7, T47D and MDA-MB-231, employing, the antiproliferative assay of Lin and Hwang (1991) slightly modified. SPD (10(-10) - 10(-6) M) exhibited strong antiproliferative activity in estrogen and progestin-dependent MCF-7 cells (EC50 = 2.24 x 10(-7) M) and in hormone insensitive MDA-MB-231 (EC50 = 5.62 x 10(-7) M), but caused only partial inhibition of the estrogen- insensitive T47D cells (EC50 = 1.58 x 10(-6) M). However, tamoxifen showed strong inhibition of MCF-7 cells (EC50 = 1.41 x 10(-6) M) and to a lesser extent the T47D cells (EC50 = 2.5 x 10(-6) M) but did not affect the MDA-MB-231 cells. SPD at 1 microM exerted a beffer antiestrogenic activity than 1 microM tamoxifen in suppressing the growth of MCF-7 cells stimulated by 1 nM estradiol. Combined treatment of both SPD and tamoxifen at 1 microM showed additional inhibition on the growth of MCF-7 cells in culture. The antiproliferative properties of SPD are effective on both receptor positive and receptor negative mammary Cancer cells, and thus appear to be neither dependent on cellular receptor status nor cellular hormone responses. This enhances in vivo approaches as tumors are heterogenous masses with varying receptor status.

Figures
Products