1. Academic Validation
  2. Metamitron-resistant Chenopodium album from sugar beet: cross-resistance profile

Metamitron-resistant Chenopodium album from sugar beet: cross-resistance profile

  • Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2006;71(3 Pt A):725-32.
E Mechant 1 R Bulcke
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 Weed Science Unit, Ghent University Coupure links 653, BE-9000 Gent, Belgium.
PMID: 17390814
Abstract

In recent years, in several of the Belgian sugar beet growing regions, farmers have been confronted with unsatisfactory control of fat hen (Chenopodium album L.). Greenhouse bioassays conducted on reference C. album populations and on "suspected" populations from sugar beet fields where poor fat hen control had been observed, revealed that all "suspected" populations were resistant to metamitron, a key herbicide in the modern low rate weed control programs in sugar beet. These metamitron-resistant biotypes were all cross-resistant to atrazine. Since cross-resistance, particularly negative cross-resistance or reversed resistance, is known to play a major role in resistance management, other herbicides used in sugar beet and/or in rotational crops were tested to determine the cross-resistance profile of metamitron-resistant biotypes. Greenhouse bioassays were conducted using herbicides from different chemical families representing different modes of action. Cross-resistance was found for metribuzin, lenacil and chloridazon, all HRAC Group C1 herbicides that inhibit photosynthesis at PS II. The metamitron-resistant C. album populations examined showed negative cross-resistance to S-metolachlor (HRAC Group K3: inhibition of cell division), prosuifocarb (Group N: lipid synthesis, not AC-Case, inhibition), aclonifen and clomazone (both Group F3: inhibition of carotenoid biosynthesis).

Figures
Products
  • Cat. No.
    Product Name
    Description
    Target
    Research Area
  • HY-116706
    99.88%