1. Academic Validation
  2. Activation of GPR18 by cannabinoid compounds: a tale of biased agonism

Activation of GPR18 by cannabinoid compounds: a tale of biased agonism

  • Br J Pharmacol. 2014 Aug;171(16):3908-17. doi: 10.1111/bph.12746.
Linda Console-Bram 1 Eugen Brailoiu Gabriela Cristina Brailoiu Haleli Sharir Mary E Abood
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 Center for Substance Abuse Research, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract

Background and purpose: GPR18 is a candidate Cannabinoid Receptor, but its classification as such is controversial. The rationale of the study presented herein was to consider the effects of N-arachidonoyl glycine (NAGly) and cannabinoids via differential G-protein coupled pathways, in addition to β-arrestin signalling. Cellular localization of GPR18 receptors was also examined.

Experimental approach: Calcium mobilization and ERK1/2 phosphorylation were quantified in a cell line stably expressing GPR18 (HEK293/GPR18 cells). In addition, using the DiscoveRx PathHunter CHO-K1 GPR18 β-arrestin cell line, recruitment of β-arrestin was quantified.

Key results: Concentration-dependent increases in intracellular calcium and ERK1/2 phosphorylation were observed in the presence of NAGly, abnormal cannabidiol (AbnCBD), O-1602, O-1918 and Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ(9)-THC) in HEK293/GPR18 cells. The initial rise in intracellular calcium in the presence of NAGly, O1918 and THC was blocked by either Gα(q) or Gα(i/o) inhibition. The ERK1/2 phosphorylation was inhibited by Pertussis toxin and N-arachidonoyl-L-serine (NARAS). Recruitment of β-arrestin in the PathHunter CHO-K1 GPR18 cell line revealed a differential pattern of GPR18 activation; of all the ligands tested, only Δ(9)-THC produced a concentration-dependent response. The localization of GPR18 receptors within the HEK293/GPR18 cells is both intracellular, and on the plasma membrane.

Conclusions and implications: These findings suggest that GPR18 activation involves several signal transduction pathways indicative of biased agonism, thereby providing a plausible explanation for the apparent discrepancies in GPR18 activation found in the literature. Additionally, the results presented herein provide further evidence for GPR18 as a candidate Cannabinoid Receptor.

Figures