1. Academic Validation
  2. A Novel Domain-Specific Mutation in a Sclerosteosis Patient Suggests a Role of LRP4 as an Anchor for Sclerostin in Human Bone

A Novel Domain-Specific Mutation in a Sclerosteosis Patient Suggests a Role of LRP4 as an Anchor for Sclerostin in Human Bone

  • J Bone Miner Res. 2016 Apr;31(4):874-81. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2782.
Igor Fijalkowski 1 Ellen Geets 1 Ellen Steenackers 1 Viviane Van Hoof 2 Feliciano J Ramos 3 Geert Mortier 1 Ana Maria Fortuna 4 Wim Van Hul 1 Eveline Boudin 1
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Medical Genetics, University of Antwerp and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • 2 Department of Clinical Chemistry, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • 3 Unidad de Genética, Servicio de Pediatria, Hospital Clinico Universitario "Lozano Blesa", GCV-CIBERER, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
  • 4 Centro de Genética Médica, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, and Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine, UMIB, ICBAS-UP,, Porto, Portugal.
Abstract

Mutations in the LRP4 gene, coding for a Wnt signaling coreceptor, have been found to cause several allelic conditions. Among these, two are characterized by a strong skeletal involvement, namely sclerosteosis and Cenani-Lenz syndrome. In this work, we evaluated the role of LRP4 in the pathophysiology of these diseases. First, we report a novel LRP4 mutation, leading to the substitution of arginine at position 1170 in glutamine, identified in a patient with sclerosteosis. This mutation is located in the central cavity of the third β-propeller domain, which is in line with two other sclerosteosis mutations we previously described. Reporter assays demonstrate that this mutation leads to impaired sclerostin inhibition of Wnt signaling. Moreover, we compared the effect of this novel variant to mutations causing Cenani-Lenz syndrome and show that impaired membrane trafficking of the LRP4 protein is the likely mechanism underlying Cenani-Lenz syndrome. This is in contrast to sclerosteosis mutations, previously shown to impair the binding between LRP4 and sclerostin. In addition, to better understand the biology of LRP4, we investigated the circulating sclerostin levels in the serum of a patient suffering from sclerosteosis owing to a LRP4 mutation. We demonstrate that impaired sclerostin binding to the mutated LRP4 protein leads to dramatic increase in circulating sclerostin in this patient. With this study, we provide the first evidence suggesting that LRP4 is responsible for the retention of sclerostin in the bone environment in humans. These findings raise potential concerns about the utility of determining circulating sclerostin levels as a marker for other bone-related parameters. Although more studies are needed to fully understand the mechanism whereby LRP4 facilitates sclerostin action, it is clear that this protein represents a potent target for future osteoporosis therapies and an interesting alternative for the antisclerostin treatment currently under study.

Keywords

ANABOLICS; LRPs; SCLEROSTEOSIS; WNT; β-CATENIN.

Figures