1. Academic Validation
  2. Crystal Structure of the Labile Complex of IL-24 with the Extracellular Domains of IL-22R1 and IL-20R2

Crystal Structure of the Labile Complex of IL-24 with the Extracellular Domains of IL-22R1 and IL-20R2

  • J Immunol. 2018 Oct 1;201(7):2082-2093. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1800726.
Jacek Lubkowski 1 Cem Sonmez 2 Sergey V Smirnov 3 Andriy Anishkin 4 Sergei V Kotenko 3 Alexander Wlodawer 2
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Macromolecular Crystallography Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702; [email protected].
  • 2 Macromolecular Crystallography Laboratory, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD 21702.
  • 3 Department of Microbiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Center for Immunity and Inflammation, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey at University Hospital, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ 07103; and.
  • 4 Biology Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742.
Abstract

Crystal structure of the ternary complex of human IL-24 with two receptors, IL-22R1 and IL-20R2, has been determined at 2.15 Å resolution. A crystallizable complex was created by a novel approach involving fusing the ligand with a flexible linker to the presumed low-affinity receptor, and coexpression of this construct in Drosophila S2 cells together with the presumed high-affinity receptor. This approach, which may be generally applicable to other multiprotein complexes with low-affinity components, was necessitated by the instability of IL-24 expressed by itself in either bacteria or insect cells. Although IL-24 expressed in Escherichia coli was unstable and precipitated almost immediately upon its refolding and purification, a small fraction of IL-24 remaining in the folded state was shown to be active in a cell-based assay. In the crystal structure presented here, we found that two cysteine residues in IL-24 do not form a predicted disulfide bond. Lack of structural restraint by disulfides, present in other related cytokines, is most likely reason for the low stability of IL-24. Although the contact area between IL-24 and IL-22R1 is larger than between the cytokine and IL-20R2, calculations show the latter interaction to be slightly more stable, suggesting that the shared receptor (IL-20R2) might be the higher-affinity receptor.

Figures