2. Academic Validation
  3. Influence of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) exposure on angiogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs)

Influence of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) exposure on angiogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs)

  • Dent Mater. 2021 Mar;37(3):534-546. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.12.008.
André Jochums 1,  Joachim Volk 2,  Renke Perduns 3,  Melanie Plum 4,  Peter Schertl 5,  Athina Bakopoulou 6,  Werner Geurtsen 7
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, Hannover Medical School, D-30625 Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • 2 Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, Hannover Medical School, D-30625 Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • 3 Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, Hannover Medical School, D-30625 Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • 4 Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, Hannover Medical School, D-30625 Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • 5 Department of Cell Biology and Biophysics, Leibniz University Hannover, D-30419 Hannover, Germany.
  • 6 Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (A.U.Th), Greece. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • 7 Department of Conservative Dentistry, Periodontology and Preventive Dentistry, Hannover Medical School, D-30625 Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: [email protected].
PMID: 33579530 DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.12.008
Abstract

Objective: The angiogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) is important for tissue homeostasis and wound healing. In this study the influence of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) on angiogenic differentiation was investigated.

Methods: To evaluate HEMA effects on angiogenic differentiation, DPSCs were cultivated in angiogenic differentiation medium (ADM) in the presence or absence of non-toxic HEMA concentrations (0.1 mM and 0.5 mM). Subsequently, angiogenic differentiation was analyzed on the molecular level by qRT-PCR and protein profiler analyzes of angiogenic markers and flow cytometry of PECAM1. The influence of HEMA on angiogenic phenotypes was analyzed by cell migration and sprouting assays.

Results: Treatment with 0.5 mM HEMA during differentiation can lead to a slight reduction of angiogenic markers on mRNA level. HEMA also seems to slightly reduce the quantity of angiogenic cytokines (not significant). However, these HEMA concentrations have no detectable influence on cell migration, the abundance of PECAM1 and the formation of capillaries. Higher concentrations caused primary cytotoxic effects in angiogenic differentiation experiments conducted for longer periods than 72 h.

Significance: Non-cytotoxic HEMA concentrations seem to have a minor impact on the expression of angiogenic markers, essentially on the mRNA level, without affecting the angiogenic differentiation process itself on a detectable level.

Keywords

Angiogenic differentiation; Composite resin; Dental material; Dental pulp stem cells; Gene expression; HEMA; Matrigel; Migration; Proteome profiler; Spheroid sprouting.

Figures
Products