1. Academic Validation
  2. Pharmacological and chemical properties of astressin, antisauvagine-30 and alpha-helCRF: significance for behavioral experiments

Pharmacological and chemical properties of astressin, antisauvagine-30 and alpha-helCRF: significance for behavioral experiments

  • Neuropharmacology. 2001 Sep;41(4):507-16. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3908(01)00094-6.
O Brauns 1 T Liepold J Radulovic J Spiess
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 Max Planck Institute for Experimental Medicine, Department of Molecular Neuroendocrinology, Hermann Rein Str. 3, 37075 Goettingen, Germany. [email protected]
Abstract

Corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) represents an early chemical signal in the stress response and modulates various brain functions through G protein-coupled receptors. Two CRF receptor subtypes, CRF(1) and CRF(2), have been identified. Since the physicochemical properties of CRF receptor antagonists might influence their biological potency, the peptidic antagonists astressin, alpha-helical CRF(9-41) (alpha-helCRF) and antisauvagine-30 (aSvg-30) have been analyzed. The rank order of solubility of these compounds in artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF, pH 7.4) was aSvg-30>alpha-helCRF>>astressin, whereas the rank order of relative lipophilicity as determined with RP-HPLC was alpha-helCRF>astressin>aSvg-30. The calculated isoelectric points were 4.1 (alpha-helCRF), 7.4 (astressin) and 10.0 (aSvg-30). According to Schild analysis of the CRF receptor-dependent cAMP production of transfected HEK cells, aSvg-30 exhibited a competitive antagonism and displayed a 340 fold selectivity for mCRF(2 beta) receptor. For astressin, however, the pharmacodynamic profile could not be explained by a simple competitive mechanism as indicated by Schild slopes >1 for rCRF(1) or mCRF(2 beta) receptor. Behavioral experiments demonstrated that after i.c.v. injection, alpha-helCRF reduced oCRF-induced anxiety-like behavior in the elevated plus-maze, whereas astressin, despite its higher in vitro potency, did not. These findings could be explained by different physicochemical properties of the antagonists employed.

Figures
Products