1. Academic Validation
  2. Inhibition of monoacylglycerol lipase and fatty acid amide hydrolase by analogues of 2-arachidonoylglycerol

Inhibition of monoacylglycerol lipase and fatty acid amide hydrolase by analogues of 2-arachidonoylglycerol

  • Br J Pharmacol. 2004 Nov;143(6):774-84. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705948.
Nazdar Ghafouri 1 Gunnar Tiger Raj K Razdan Anu Mahadevan Roger G Pertwee Billy R Martin Christopher J Fowler
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Abstract

The pharmacology of monoacylglycerol Lipase (MAGL) is not well understood. In consequence, the abilities of a series of analogues of 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) to inhibit cytosolic 2-oleoylglycerol and membrane-bound anandamide hydolysis by MAGL and fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), respectively, have been investigated. 2-AG and its 1-regioisomer (1-AG) interacted with MAGL with similar affinities (IC(50) values 13 and 17 mum, respectively). Shorter homologues of 2-AG (2-linoleoylglycerol and 2-oleoylglycerol) had affinities for MAGL similar to 2-AG. This pattern was also seen when the arachidonoyl side chain of arachidonoyl trifluoromethylketone was replaced by an oleoyl side chain. Arachidonoyl serinol (IC(50) value 73 microM) was a weaker inhibitor of MAGL than 2-AG. The IC(50) values of noladin ether towards MAGL and FAAH were 36 and 3 microM, respectively. Arachidonoyl glycine interacted with FAAH (IC(50) value 4.9 microM) but only weakly interacted with MAGL (IC(50) value >100 microM). alpha-Methyl-1-AG had similar potencies towards MAGL and FAAH (IC(50) values of 11 and 33 microM, respectively). O-2203 (1-(20-cyano-16,16-dimethyl-eicosa-5,8,11,14-tetraenoyl) glycerol) and O-2204 (2-(20-hydroxy-16,16-dimethyl-eicosa-5,8,11,14-tetraenoyl) glycerol) were slightly less potent, but again affected both enzymes equally. alpha-Methyl-1-AG, O-2203 and O-2204 interacted only weakly with cannabinoid CB(1) receptors expressed in CHO cells (K(i) values 1.8, 3.7 and 3.2 microM, respectively, compared with 0.24 microM for 1-AG) and showed no evidence of central Cannabinoid Receptor activation in vivo at doses up to 30 mg kg(-1) i.v. It is concluded that compounds like alpha-Methyl-1-AG, O-2203 and O-2204 may be useful as leads for the discovery of selective MAGL inhibitors that lack direct effects upon cannabinoid receptors.

Figures
Products