1. Academic Validation
  2. 68Ga-DOTATATE and 123I-mIBG as imaging biomarkers of disease localisation in metastatic neuroblastoma: implications for molecular radiotherapy

68Ga-DOTATATE and 123I-mIBG as imaging biomarkers of disease localisation in metastatic neuroblastoma: implications for molecular radiotherapy

  • Nucl Med Commun. 2020 Nov;41(11):1169-1177. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001265.
Jennifer E Gains 1 Matthew D Aldridge 2 Maria Vittoria Mattoli 3 Jamshed B Bomanji 2 Lorenzo Biassoni 4 Ananth Shankar 5 Mark N Gaze 1
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Oncology.
  • 2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
  • 3 Department of Neurosciences, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. D'Annunzio" Chieti-Pescara University, Chieti, Italy.
  • 4 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust.
  • 5 Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract

Purpose: Iodine-131-labelled meta-iodobenzylguanidine (I-mIBG) and lutetium-177-labelled DOTATATE (Lu-DOTATATE) are used for molecular radiotherapy of metastatic neuroblastoma. These are taken up by the noradrenaline transporter (NAT) and the Somatostatin Receptor subtype 2 (SSTR-2), respectively. Scintigraphy of iodine-123-labelled meta-iodobenzylguanidine (I-mIBG) and gallium-68 DOTATATE (Ga-DOTATATE) PET are used to select patients for therapy. These demonstrate the extent and location of tumour, and avidity of uptake by cells expressing NAT and SSTR-2, respectively. This study compared the similarities and differences in the anatomical distribution of these two imaging biomarkers in an unselected series of patients with metastatic neuroblastoma undergoing assessment for molecular radiotherapy.

Methods: Paired whole-body planar I-mIBG views and Ga-DOTATATE maximum intensity projection PET scans of metastatic neuroblastoma patients were visually compared. The disease extent was assessed by a semiquantitative scoring method.

Results: Paired scans from 42 patients were reviewed. Ga-DOTATATE scans were positive in all patients, I-mIBG scans were negative in two. In two patients, there was a mismatch, with some lesions identified only on the I-mIBG scan, and Others visible only on the Ga-DOTATATE scan.

Conclusion: Ga-DOTATATE and I-mIBG scans yield complementary information. For a more comprehensive assessment, consideration could be given to the use of both I-mIBG and Ga-DOTATATE imaging scans. Because of the heterogeneity of distribution of molecular targets revealed by these techniques, a combination of both I-mIBG and Lu-DOTATATE molecular radiotherapy may possibly be more effective than either alone.

Figures
Products