1. Academic Validation
  2. Efficacy and safety of elinzanetant, a selective neurokinin-1,3 receptor antagonist for vasomotor symptoms: a dose-finding clinical trial (SWITCH-1)

Efficacy and safety of elinzanetant, a selective neurokinin-1,3 receptor antagonist for vasomotor symptoms: a dose-finding clinical trial (SWITCH-1)

  • Menopause. 2023 Mar 1;30(3):239-246. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002138.
James A Simon 1 Richard A Anderson 2 Elizabeth Ballantyne 3 James Bolognese 4 Cecilia Caetano 5 Hadine Joffe 6 Mary Kerr 3 Nick Panay 7 Christian Seitz 8 Susan Seymore 3 Mike Trower 3 Lineke Zuurman 5 Steve Pawsey 3
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 From the George Washington University, IntimMedicine Specialists, Washington, DC.
  • 2 MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
  • 3 NeRRe Therapeutics, Stevenage, United Kingdom.
  • 4 Cytel, Waltham, MA.
  • 5 Bayer CC AG, Basel, Switzerland.
  • 6 Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • 7 Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea and Westminster Hospitals, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
  • 8 Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany.
Abstract

Objective: Neurokinin (NK)-3 and NK-1 receptors have been implicated in the etiology of vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and sleep disturbances associated with menopause. This phase 2b, adaptive, dose-range finding study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of multiple doses of elinzanetant (NT-814), a selective NK-1,3 receptor antagonist, in women experiencing VMS associated with menopause, and investigate the impact of elinzanetant on sleep and quality of life.

Methods: Postmenopausal women aged 40 to 65 years who experienced seven or more moderate-to-severe VMS per day were randomized to receive elinzanetant 40, 80, 120, or 160 mg or placebo once daily using an adaptive design algorithm. Coprimary endpoints were reduction in mean frequency and severity of moderate-to-severe VMS at weeks 4 and 12. Secondary endpoints included patient-reported assessments of sleep and quality of life.

Results: Elinzanetant 120 mg and 160 mg achieved reductions in VMS frequency versus placebo from week 1 throughout 12 weeks of treatment. Least square mean reductions were statistically significant versus placebo at both primary endpoint time points for elinzanetant 120 mg (week 4: -3.93 [SE, 1.02], P < 0.001; week 12: -2.95 [1.15], P = 0.01) and at week 4 for elinzanetant 160 mg (-2.63 [1.03]; P = 0.01). Both doses also led to clinically meaningful improvements in measures of sleep and quality of life. All doses of elinzanetant were well tolerated.

Conclusions: Elinzanetant is an effective and well-tolerated nonhormone treatment option for postmenopausal women with VMS and associated sleep disturbance. Elinzanetant also improves quality of life in women with VMS.

Figures
Products