1. Academic Validation
  2. Population Pharmacokinetics of Sarilumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Population Pharmacokinetics of Sarilumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

  • Clin Pharmacokinet. 2019 Nov;58(11):1455-1467. doi: 10.1007/s40262-019-00765-1.
Christine Xu 1 Yaming Su 2 3 Anne Paccaly 4 Vanaja Kanamaluru 2
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Sanofi Genzyme, 55 Corporation Drive, Bridgewater, NJ, 08807, USA. [email protected].
  • 2 Sanofi Genzyme, 55 Corporation Drive, Bridgewater, NJ, 08807, USA.
  • 3 Daiichi Sankyo, Inc, Basking Ridge, NJ, USA.
  • 4 Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, NY, USA.
Abstract

Background and objective: Sarilumab binds to the interleukin-6 receptor with high affinity, inhibiting cis and trans signaling by interleukin-6. Sarilumab has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. The objective of this study was to develop a population-pharmacokinetic model using data from 1770 patients with rheumatoid arthritis across phase I-III studies.

Methods: Potential covariates were identified using a stepwise forward-addition and backward-deletion strategy, and the final model was evaluated by visual predictive check and bootstrap methods.

Results: Sarilumab pharmacokinetics is described by a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and parallel linear and nonlinear Michaelis-Menten elimination. A subcutaneous dose of sarilumab 200 mg every 2 weeks resulted in more pronounced saturation of the nonlinear clearance pathway over the dosing interval than 150 mg every 2 weeks. Steady-state exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from day 0 to day 14) increased twofold with dose escalation from 150 to 200 mg every 2 weeks. Body weight, anti-drug antibody status, sarilumab drug product, sex, creatinine clearance, albumin, and baseline C-reactive protein levels were identified as significant covariates according to the predefined statistical significance criteria in stepwise covariate searches. The main intrinsic source of pharmacokinetic variability in exposure was body weight. Compared with a typical 71-kg patient, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from day 0 to day 14 was 20-23% lower for an 83-kg patient and 20-25% higher for a 62-kg patient.

Conclusions: These findings, combined with the safety and efficacy data, indicated limited clinical relevance of body-weight effect on sarilumab exposure. No adjustment in sarilumab dose is required for body weight or any other demographics assessed.

Figures
Products