1. Academic Validation
  2. Erenumab versus topiramate for the prevention of migraine - a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled phase 4 trial

Erenumab versus topiramate for the prevention of migraine - a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled phase 4 trial

  • Cephalalgia. 2022 Feb;42(2):108-118. doi: 10.1177/03331024211053571.
Uwe Reuter 1 2 Marc Ehrlich 3 Astrid Gendolla 4 Axel Heinze 5 Jan Klatt 6 Shihua Wen 7 Peggy Hours-Zesiger 6 Jacqueline Nickisch 3 Christian Sieder 3 Christian Hentschke 3 Monika Maier-Peuschel 3
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • 2 Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
  • 3 Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany.
  • 4 Praxis Gendolla, Essen, Germany.
  • 5 The Kiel Migraine and Headache Centre, Kiel, Germany.
  • 6 Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
  • 7 Novartis AG, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract

Background: We compared the tolerability and efficacy of erenumab, a monoclonal antibody binding to the Calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, to topiramate for migraine prophylaxis in adults.

Methods: HER-MES was a 24-week, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, controlled trial conducted in 82 sites in Germany. Patients with ≥4 migraine days per month and naïve to study drugs were randomly assigned (1:1) to either subcutaneous erenumab (70 or 140 mg/month) plus topiramate placebo (erenumab group) or oral topiramate at the individual dose with optimal efficacy (50-100 mg/day) plus erenumab placebo (topiramate group).The primary endpoint was medication discontinuation due to an adverse event during the double-blind phase. The proportion of patients that achieved ≥50% reduction from baseline in monthly migraine days during the last 3 months of the double-blind phase was a secondary endpoint.

Results: Seven hundred and seventy-seven patients were randomised (from 22 February 2019 to 29 July, 2020) and 95.1% completed the study. In the erenumab group, 10.6% discontinued medication due to adverse events compared to 38.9% in the topiramate group (odds ratio, 0.19; 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.27; p < 0.001). Significantly more patients achieved a ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days from baseline with erenumab (55.4% vs. 31.2%; odds ratio 2.76; 95% confidence interval 2.06-3.71; p < 0.001). No new safety signals occurred.

Conclusions: Erenumab demonstrated a favourable tolerability and efficacy profile compared to topiramate.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03828539, URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03828539.

Keywords

CGRP; Erenumab; head-to-head study; migraine; prophylaxis; topiramate.

Figures
Products