1. Academic Validation
  2. Cycloalkyl-substituted aryl chloroethylureas inhibiting cell cycle progression in G0/G1 phase and thioredoxin-1 nuclear translocation

Cycloalkyl-substituted aryl chloroethylureas inhibiting cell cycle progression in G0/G1 phase and thioredoxin-1 nuclear translocation

  • Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2008 Jun 15;18(12):3526-31. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2008.05.028.
Jessica S Fortin 1 Marie-France Côté Jacques Lacroix Alexandre Patenaude Eric Petitclerc René C-Gaudreault
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 Unité des Biotechnologies et de Bioingénierie, CRCHUQ, Hôpital Saint-François d'Assise, Québec, QC, Canada. [email protected]
Abstract

1-(2-Chloroethyl)-3-(4-cyclohexylphenyl)urea (cHCEU) has been shown to abrogate the presence of thioredoxin-1 into the nucleus through its selective covalent alkylation. In the present letter we have evaluated the structure-activity relationships of the substituents at positions 3 and 4 of the phenyl ring of cHCEU derivatives on cell cycle progression and thioredoxin-1 nuclear translocation. Active CEU derivatives exhibited GI(50) ranging from 1.9 to 49muM on breast carcinoma MCF-7, skin melanoma M21, and colon carcinoma HT-29 cells. On one hand, compounds 1, 2, 9c, 10c, 13, and 14 arrested the cell cycle in G(2)/M phase while CEUs 3, 4, 5c, 6c, 11c, and 12c blocked the cell division in G(0)/G(1) phase. On the Other hand, CEUs 2-4, 5c, 7c, 8c, 11c, and 12c abrogated the translocation of thioredoxin-1 while the Other CEU derivatives were inactive in that respect. Our results suggest that CEU substituted on the phenyl ring at position 3 or 4 by lower cycloalkyl or cycloalkoxy groups arrest cell progression in G(0)/G(1) phase through mechanism of action different from their antimicrotubule counterparts, presumably via thioredoxin-1 alkylation and modulation of its activity. The mechanism of action of these new molecules is still undetermined. However, the significant accumulation of cells in G(0)/G(1) phase suggests that these molecules may act similarly to known chemopreventive agents against cancers. In addition, the inhibition of Trx-1 nuclear localization also suggests the abrogation of an important chemoresistance mechanism towards a variety of chemotherapeutic agents.

Figures