1. Academic Validation
  2. Androgen Signaling in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Cell Lines In Vitro

Androgen Signaling in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Cell Lines In Vitro

  • Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Dec;62(12):3402-3414. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4794-5.
Helen M Palethorpe 1 Paul A Drew 2 3 Eric Smith 2 4
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Solid Cancer Regulation Group, Discipline of Surgery, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, 28 Woodville Rd, Woodville South, SA, 5011, Australia. [email protected].
  • 2 Solid Cancer Regulation Group, Discipline of Surgery, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, The University of Adelaide, 28 Woodville Rd, Woodville South, SA, 5011, Australia.
  • 3 School of Nursing and Midwifery, Flinders University, PO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
  • 4 Department of Medical Oncology, Basil Hetzel Institute for Translational Health Research, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, 28 Woodville Rd, Woodville South, SA, 5011, Australia.
Abstract

Background: We showed previously that nuclear localization of the Androgen Receptor (AR) and expression of the androgen-responsive gene FK506-binding protein 5 (FKBP5) in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) tissues were associated with decreased patient survival, suggesting a role for androgens in this Cancer.

Aim: To investigate the effect of the AR ligand 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) on AR-expressing EAC cell lines in vitro.

Methods and results: In tissue resection specimens from EAC patients, FKBP5 expression was positively associated with proliferation as measured by Ki-67 expression. We stably transduced AR into three AR-negative EAC cell lines, OE33, JH-EsoAd1, and OE19, to investigate androgen signaling in vitro. In the AR-expressing cell lines, 10 nM DHT, the concentration typically used to study AR signaling, induced changes in the expression of androgen-responsive genes and inhibited proliferation by inducing cell cycle arrest and senescence. At lower DHT concentrations near the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50), the AR-expressing cell lines proliferated and there were changes in the expression of androgen-responsive genes. In direct co-culture with cancer-associated fibroblast-like PShTert myofibroblasts, 10 nM DHT induced changes in the expression of androgen-responsive genes but did not inhibit proliferation.

Conclusions: This is the first study to show that EAC cell lines respond to androgen in vitro. Proliferation together with the expression of androgen-responsive genes was dependent on the concentration of DHT, or the presence of a permissive microenvironment, consistent with observations in the tissues. These findings are consistent with a role for androgen signaling in EAC.

Keywords

Androgen receptor; Dihydrotestosterone; Direct co-culture; Esophageal adenocarcinoma; FKBP5; Fibroblast; In vitro.

Figures
Products