1. Academic Validation
  2. IL-36α/IL-36RA/IL-38 signaling mediates inflammation and barrier disruption in human corneal epithelial cells under hyperosmotic stress

IL-36α/IL-36RA/IL-38 signaling mediates inflammation and barrier disruption in human corneal epithelial cells under hyperosmotic stress

  • Ocul Surf. 2021 Oct;22:163-171. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2021.08.012.
Jin-Miao Li 1 Rong Lu 2 Yun Zhang 3 Jing Lin 4 Xia Hua 4 Stephen C Pflugfelder 4 De-Quan Li 5
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Ocular Surface Center, Cullen Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • 2 State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • 3 Ocular Surface Center, Cullen Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; Eye Hospital and School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
  • 4 Ocular Surface Center, Cullen Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
  • 5 Ocular Surface Center, Cullen Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
Abstract

Purpose: To explore the distinct expression and diverse roles of IL-36 cytokines in dry eye disease using an in vitro hyperosmolarity model of human corneal epithelial cells (HCECs).

Methods: Primary HCECs were cultured from fresh donor limbal explants. Hyperosmolarity model was established by switching HCECs from isosmotic (312 mOsM) to hyperosmotic medium (350-500 mOsM) alone or with addition of rhIL-36RA or rhIL-38 for 2-48 h. Some cultures were treated with IL-36α (1-10 ng/ml) with or without rhIL-36RA or rhIL-38. Gene expression was detected by RT-qPCR; and protein production and barrier disruption were evaluated by ELISA and/or immunofluorescent staining.

Results: IL-36 cytokines were differential expressed in primary HCECs. Among 3 pro-inflammatory agonists, IL-36α, but not IL-36β and IL-36γ, was distinctly induced at osmolarity-dependent manner while two antagonist IL-36RA and IL-38 were significantly suppressed in HCECs exposed to hyperosmotic stress. IL-36α increased to 4.4-fold in mRNA and 6.9-fold at protein levels (116.0 ± 36.33 pg/ml vs 16.79 ± 6.51 pg/ml in controls) by 450 mOsM, but dramatically inhibited by addition of rhIL-36RA or rhIL-38. Exogenous rhIL-36α stimulated expression of TNF-α and IL-1β at mRNA and protein levels and disrupted tight junction proteins ZO-1 and occludin. However, rhIL-36RA or rhIL-38 suppressed TNF-α and IL-1β production and protected HCECs from barrier disruption in response to IL-36α or hyperosmolarity.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that the stimulated pro-inflammatory IL-36α with the suppressed antagonists IL-36RA and IL-38 is a novel mechanism by which hyperosmolarity induces inflammation in dry eye. IL-36RA and IL-38 may have a therapeutic potential in dry eye.

Keywords

Barrier; Corneal epithelium; Dry eye; Hyperosmolarity; IL-36; IL-36RA; IL-38; Inflammation.

Figures
Products