1. Academic Validation
  2. Female iPSC X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) erosion and its transcriptomic effects during CRISPR gene editing and neural differentiation

Female iPSC X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) erosion and its transcriptomic effects during CRISPR gene editing and neural differentiation

  • bioRxiv. 2026 Mar 1:2026.02.27.708613. doi: 10.64898/2026.02.27.708613.
Christina Thapa 1 2 Emily K Oh 1 David Sirkin 1 Jennifer Lahey 1 Sol Díaz de León Guerrerro 3 4 Ada McCarroll 1 Prarthana Gowda 3 4 Hanwen Zhang 1 Alexandra Barishman 1 Lilia Peyton 1 Siwei Zhang 1 2 Rebecca M Pollak 5 6 Ronald P Hart 5 Carlos N Pato 6 Anat Kreimer 5 7 Jennifer G Mulle 3 6 8 Alan R Sanders 1 2 Zhiping Pang 3 4 Jubao Duan 1 2
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Center for Psychiatric Genetics, Endeavor Health, Evanston, IL, USA.
  • 2 Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • 3 Department of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
  • 4 Center for NeuroMetabolism, Child Health Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
  • 5 Center for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
  • 6 Department of Psychiatry, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
  • 7 Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
  • 8 Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Abstract

Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC) and iPSC-differentiated neural cells, in combination with CRISPR editing, are commonly used for studying neurodevelopmental and Other brain disorders. Female iPSCs undergo random X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) via epigenetic silencing by noncoding X inactive specific transcript (XIST). It is known that female iPSCs may lose XIST expression, leading to XCI erosion that affects both X-linked and autosomal gene expression. However, the effects of CRSIPR editing and neural differentiation on XCI erosion in iPSC-derived neurons and how this may confound a real-world transcriptomic analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) are poorly understood. Here, leveraging bulk RNA-seq of hundreds of CRISPR-edited female iPSC lines from four donor lines for 66 genes and single-cell RNA-seq of iPSC-derived neurons of a subset of 42 edited genes, we investigated the effects of XCI erosion during CRISPR editing and in iPSC-derived neurons. We found that XCI erosion was variable in CRISPR-edited female iPSCs and largely preserved in iPSC-derived neurons. Like in iPSCs, XIST in neurons predominately influenced the expression of X-linked genes; however, its effect on autosomal genes was more pronounced in single neurons. Mechanistically, XIST epigenetically causes allelic imbalance of both X-linked and autosomal genes, with the former showing stronger allele-specific expression (ASE) bias. Notably, XIST-induced ASE bias exhibited a conserved positional pattern at loci affecting neurodevelopmental genes across different female lines and cell types. Finally, we demonstrated a confounding effect of XCI erosion on DEG analyses in iPSC-derived neurons. These results have significant implications in hiPSC modeling of neurodevelopmental and Other brain disorders.

Keywords

CRSIPR gene editing; Human pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC); X-chromosome inactivation (XCI); X-chromosome inactive specific transcript (XIST); XCI erosion; allele-specific expression (ASE); autosomal; neural differentiation; neurodevelopment.

Figures
Products