1. Academic Validation
  2. A randomized controlled trial of etilevodopa in patients with Parkinson disease who have motor fluctuations

A randomized controlled trial of etilevodopa in patients with Parkinson disease who have motor fluctuations

  • Arch Neurol. 2006 Feb;63(2):210-6. doi: 10.1001/archneur.63.2.210.
Karen Blindauer 1 Ira Shoulson David Oakes Karl Kieburtz Steven Schwid Stanley Fahn Matthew Stern Christopher Goetz John Nutt Sari Goren Naim Sayag Marisa Scolnik Ruth Levy Eli Eyal Phyllis Salzman Mary Pagano Parkinson Study Group
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 Department of Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226, USA. [email protected]
Abstract

Background: Motor fluctuations are a common complication in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) receiving long-term levodopa therapy. Slowed gastric emptying and poor solubility of levodopa in the gastrointestinal tract may delay the onset of drug benefit after dosing. Etilevodopa is an ethyl-ester prodrug of levodopa that has greater gastric solubility, passes quickly into the small intestine, is rapidly hydrolyzed to levodopa, and has a shortened time to maximum levodopa concentration.

Objective: To determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of etilevodopa in patients with PD who have motor fluctuations.

Design: A double-blind, randomized, comparative clinical trial.

Setting: Forty-four sites in the United States and Canada.

Patients: Three hundred twenty-seven patients with PD who had a latency of at least 90 minutes total daily time to "on" (TTON) after levodopa dosing.

Intervention: Treatment with either etilevodopa-carbidopa or levodopa-carbidopa for 18 weeks.

Main outcome measure: Change from baseline in total daily TTON as measured using home diaries.

Results: The reduction in mean total daily TTON from baseline to treatment was 0.58 hour in the etilevodopa-carbidopa group and 0.79 hour in the levodopa-carbidopa group (P = .24). There was no significant difference between the etilevodopa-carbidopa and levodopa-carbidopa groups in the reduction of response failures (-6.82% vs -4.69%; P = .20). Total daily "off" time improved in the etilevodopa-carbidopa (-0.85 hour) and levodopa-carbidopa (-0.87 hour) groups without an increase in on time with troublesome dyskinesias.

Conclusion: Despite the theoretical pharmacokinetic advantage of etilevodopa, there was no improvement in TTON, response failures, or off time compared with levodopa.

Figures
Products