1. Academic Validation
  2. Genomic profiling is predictive of response to cisplatin treatment but not to PI3K inhibition in bladder cancer patient-derived xenografts

Genomic profiling is predictive of response to cisplatin treatment but not to PI3K inhibition in bladder cancer patient-derived xenografts

  • Oncotarget. 2016 Nov 22;7(47):76374-76389. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13062.
Lei Wei 1 Sreenivasulu Chintala 2 3 4 Eric Ciamporcero 2 Swathi Ramakrishnan 2 3 May Elbanna 2 4 Jianmin Wang 1 Qiang Hu 1 Sean T Glenn 5 Mitsuko Murakami 6 Lu Liu 6 Eduardo Cortes Gomez 6 Yuchen Sun 6 Jacob Conroy 6 Kiersten Marie Miles 6 Kullappan Malathi 7 Sudha Ramaiah 7 Anand Anbarasu 7 Anna Woloszynska-Read 2 3 Candace S Johnson 2 3 Jeffrey Conroy 6 Song Liu 1 Carl D Morrison 6 Roberto Pili 2 4
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
  • 2 Genitourinary Program, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
  • 3 Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
  • 4 Genitourinary Program, Indiana University-Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • 5 Department of Cancer Genetics, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
  • 6 Center for Personalized Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
  • 7 Medical & Biological Computing Laboratory, School of Biosciences and Technology, VIT University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Abstract

Purpose: Effective systemic therapeutic options are limited for bladder Cancer. In this preclinical study we tested whether bladder Cancer gene alterations may be predictive of treatment response.

Experimental design: We performed genomic profiling of two bladder Cancer patient derived tumor xenografts (PDX). We optimized the exome sequence analysis method to overcome the mouse genome interference.

Results: We identified a number of somatic mutations, mostly shared by the primary tumors and PDX. In particular, BLCAb001, which is less responsive to cisplatin than BLCAb002, carried non-sense mutations in several genes associated with cisplatin resistance, including MLH1, BRCA2, and CASP8. Furthermore, RNA-Seq analysis revealed the overexpression of cisplatin resistance associated genes such as SLC7A11, TLE4, and IL1A in BLCAb001. Two different PIK3CA mutations, E542K and E545K, were identified in BLCAb001 and BLCAb002, respectively. Thus, we tested whether the genomic profiling was predictive of response to a dual PI3K/mTOR targeting agent, LY3023414. Despite harboring similar PIK3CA mutations, BLCAb001 and BLCAb002 exhibited differential response, both in vitro and in vivo. Sustained target modulation was observed in the sensitive model BLCAb002 but not in BLCAb001, as well as decreased Autophagy. Interestingly, computational modelling of mutant structures and affinity binding to PI3K revealed that E542K mutation was associated with weaker drug binding than E545K.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that the presence of activating PIK3CA mutations may not necessarily predict in vivo treatment response to PI3K targeted therapies, while specific gene alterations may be predictive for cisplatin response in bladder Cancer models and, potentially, in patients as well.

Keywords

PI3KCA; patient-derived xenograft; urothelial carcinoma.

Figures
Products