1. Academic Validation
  2. Comparison of αβδ and αβγ GABAA receptors: Allosteric modulation and identification of subunit arrangement by site-selective general anesthetics

Comparison of αβδ and αβγ GABAA receptors: Allosteric modulation and identification of subunit arrangement by site-selective general anesthetics

  • Pharmacol Res. 2018 Jul;133:289-300. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.12.031.
Hua-Jun Feng 1 Stuart A Forman 2
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Department of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
  • 2 Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Department of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
Abstract

GABAA receptors play a dominant role in mediating inhibition in the mature mammalian brain, and defects of GABAergic neurotransmission contribute to the pathogenesis of a variety of neurological and psychiatric disorders. Two types of GABAergic inhibition have been described: αβγ receptors mediate phasic inhibition in response to transient high-concentrations of synaptic GABA release, and αβδ receptors produce tonic inhibitory currents activated by low-concentration extrasynaptic GABA. Both αβδ and αβγ receptors are important targets for general anesthetics, which induce apparently different changes both in GABA-dependent receptor activation and in desensitization in currents mediated by αβγ vs. αβδ receptors. Many of these differences are explained by correcting for the high agonist efficacy of GABA at most αβγ receptors vs. much lower efficacy at αβδ receptors. The stoichiometry and subunit arrangement of recombinant αβγ receptors are well established as β-α-γ-β-α, while those of αβδ receptors remain controversial. Importantly, some potent general anesthetics selectively bind in transmembrane inter-subunit pockets of αβγ receptors: etomidate acts at β+- interfaces, and the barbiturate R-5-allyl-1-methyl-5-(m-trifluoromethyl-diazirynylphenyl) barbituric acid (R-mTFD-MPAB) acts at α+- and γ+- interfaces. Thus, these drugs are useful as structural probes in αβδ receptors formed from free subunits or concatenated subunit assemblies designed to constrain subunit arrangement. Although a definite conclusion cannot be drawn, studies using etomidate and R-mTFD-MPAB support the idea that recombinant α1β3δ receptors may share stoichiometry and subunit arrangement with α1β3γ2 receptors.

Keywords

Allosteric modulation; Alphaxalone; Concatemers; Etomidate; GABA(A) receptors; General anesthetics; Pentobarbital; Propofol; R-5-allyl-1-methyl-5-(m-trifluoromethyl-diazirynylphenyl) barbituric acid (R-mTFD-MPAB); S-1-methyl-5-propyl-5-(m-trifluoromethyl-diazirynylphenyl) barbituric acid (S-mTFD-MPPB); Tetrahydrodeoxycorticosterone (THDOC); αβγ; αβδ.

Figures
Products