1. Academic Validation
  2. Differential dynamics of cullin deneddylation via COP9 signalosome subunit 5 interaction

Differential dynamics of cullin deneddylation via COP9 signalosome subunit 5 interaction

  • Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2022 Dec 31:637:341-347. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.11.045.
Yeong-Mu Kim 1 Hye-Ji Kim 1 Dong-Kyu Kim 1 Dong-Hyun Jung 1 Hyo Je Cho 1 Sangjune Kim 2 Jihoon Nah 1 Sang-Min Jang 3
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Biochemistry, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, 28644, Republic of Korea.
  • 2 Department of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, 28644, Republic of Korea.
  • 3 Department of Biochemistry, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, 28644, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: [email protected].
Abstract

Cullin-RING E3 ubiquitin ligases (CRLs) spatiotemporally regulate the proteasomal degradation of numerous cellular proteins involved in cell cycle control, DNA replication, and maintenance of genome stability. Activation of CRLs is controlled via neddylation by NEDD8-activating, -conjugating, and -attaching Enzymes to the C-terminus of scaffold cullins (CULs), whereas the COP9 signalosome (CSN) inactivates CRLs via deneddylation. Here, we show that the deneddylation rate of each CUL is differentially modulated. Dose- or time-dependent treatment with pevonedistat, a small molecule inhibitor of NEDD8-activating Enzyme (NAE), rapidly inhibits neddylation in most CULs, including CUL1, CUL3, CUL4A/B, and CUL5, whereas the deneddylation of CUL2 is slowly increased. We revealed that the different deneddylation speeds of each CUL depend on its binding strength with CSN5, the catalytic core of the CSN complex. Immunoprecipitation analysis revealed that CUL2 has a lower binding affinity for CSN5 than Other CULs. Consistently, released cells treated with CSN5 inhibitor showed that CUL2 was slowly converted to the deneddylated form compared to the rapid deneddylation of Other CULs. These findings provide mechanistic insights into the different dynamics of CULs in neddylation-deneddylation conversion.

Figures
Products