1. Academic Validation
  2. More than an attachment module: covalent inhibitor warheads influence BTK dynamics and function

More than an attachment module: covalent inhibitor warheads influence BTK dynamics and function

  • bioRxiv. 2026 May 8:2026.05.07.723540. doi: 10.64898/2026.05.07.723540.
Raji E Joseph 1 Robert G Britton 2 David Yin-Wei Lin 1 Julien Roche 1 Jeffrey A Purslow 1 D Bruce Fulton 1 Poowadon Fukasem 3 M Paul Gleeson 3 Martin J S Dyer 4 Thomas E Wales 5 Amy H Andreotti 1
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Roy J. Carver Department of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
  • 2 Division of Cancer Sciences, Cancer Research Centre, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK.
  • 3 Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology, Ladkrabang, Bangkok 10520, Thailand.
  • 4 The Ernest and Helen Scott Haematological Research Institute, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK.
  • 5 Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Abstract

Covalent inhibitors are rapidly becoming the standard of care for treatment of a range of disease states. Covalent inhibitors bind irreversibly to their target using a reactive electrophile (or 'warhead'). Acrylamide and 2-butynamide are the most commonly used cysteine targeting electrophiles. These warheads are chosen for their efficient and selective modification of the protein and are presumed to be otherwise functionally inert. Using a panel of Btk covalent inhibitors (Tirabrutinib, Acalabrutinib, Ibrutinib and Zanubrutinib), we show that the 2-butynamide warhead on Tirabrutinib and Acalabrutinib, unlike the acrylamide warhead on Ibrutinib and Zanubrutinib, induces conformational heterogeneity in key regions required for Btk signaling. Tirabrutinib or Acalabrutinib bound Btk adopt multiple conformational states that are in dynamic exchange, show increased binding to the substrate PLCγ and are less effective at inhibiting PLCγ signaling when compared to Ibrutinib. Swapping only the warheads between Tirabrutinib and Ibrutinib leads to a corresponding switch in Btk dynamics and inhibitor efficacy. The unanticipated warhead-specific allosteric effects raise interesting possibilities regarding inhibitor-specific mechanisms of resistance.

Keywords

Acalabrutinib; BTK; BTK inhibitors; Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase; Ibrutinib; Tirabrutinib; Zanubrutinib; conformational heterogeneity; covalent warhead; kinase allostery; kinase dynamics; kinase inhibitor.

Figures
Products