1. Academic Validation
  2. Structure-guided compound prioritization strategy for virtual screening identifies putative binders for the nuclear receptor LRH-1

Structure-guided compound prioritization strategy for virtual screening identifies putative binders for the nuclear receptor LRH-1

  • bioRxiv. 2026 Jun 6:2026.06.04.730240. doi: 10.64898/2026.06.04.730240.
Ana C Chang-Gonzalez 1 2 Alexis N Campbell 3 Eric W Bell 1 2 Raymond D Blind 3 4 Jens Meiler 1 2 5 6 7
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Dept. Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
  • 2 Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
  • 3 Dept. Biochemistry, Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
  • 4 Dept. Medicine, Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
  • 5 Dept. Pharmacology, Institute for Chemical Biology, Center for Applied Artificial Intelligence in Protein Dynamics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
  • 6 Institute for Drug Discovery, Institute for Computer Science, Wilhelm Ostwald Institute for Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
  • 7 Center for Scalable Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence ScaDS.AI, School of Embedded Composite Artificial Intelligence SECAI, Dresden/Leipzig, Germany.
Abstract

Compound ranking in structure-based virtual screening notoriously yields highly ranked false positive Binders due to variable poses or biases in scoring terms. We developed a compound prioritization strategy that utilizes sampled docked poses from contrasting docking approaches (targeted physics-based docking and blind docking with a generative model) against multiple models of the target protein to train a multi-layer perceptron (MLP). The model predicts Binders at the orthosteric ligand-binding pocket of the nuclear receptor LRH-1 (NR5A2). Our approach circumvents the reliance on a single docked pose for scoring compounds or individual scoring metrics for compound ranking. In a separate benchmarking set, we observed that the MLP identifies known Binders that are chemically dissimilar from the compounds in the training set and is sensitive to single scaffold modifications, making it a potential tool for lead optimization. We applied our strategy to a prospective virtual screening campaign, which resulted in the discovery of four putative LRH-1 Binders. We found that a combination of scoring and prediction metrics enriches for the hit compounds across library sizes. In all, this implementation presents a method to leverage structural and experimental data to aid virtual screening for a challenging protein target.

Keywords

Structure-based drug discovery; computer-aided drug design; data augmentation; fluorescence polarization; hit prioritization; multi-layer perceptron; nuclear receptor; virtual screening.

Figures
Products