1. Academic Validation
  2. Different pharmacology of N-desmethylclozapine at human and rat M2 and M 4 mAChRs in neocortex

Different pharmacology of N-desmethylclozapine at human and rat M2 and M 4 mAChRs in neocortex

  • Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2015 May;388(5):487-96. doi: 10.1007/s00210-014-1080-3.
S Gigout 1 S Wierschke C Dehnicke R A Deisz
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 Centre for Anatomy, Institute for Cell Biology and Neurobiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Philippstrasse, 12, 10115, Berlin, Germany.
Abstract

Cholinergic transmission plays a pivotal role in learning, memory and cognition, and disturbances of cholinergic transmission have been implicated in neurological disorders including Alzheimer's disease, epilepsy and schizophrenia. Pharmacological alleviation of these diseases by drugs including N-desmethylclozapine (NDMC), promising in animal models, often fails in patients. We therefore compared the effects of NDMC on glutamatergic and GABAergic transmission in slices from rat and human neocortex. We used carbachol (CCh; an established agonist at metabotropic muscarinic acetylcholine (ACh) receptors (mAChRs)) as a reference. Standard electrophysiological methods including intracellular and field potential recordings were used. In the rat neocortex, NDMC prevented the CCh-induced decrease of GABAA and GABAB receptor-mediated responses but not the CCh-induced increase of the paired-pulse depression. NDMC reduced neither the amplitude of the excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSP) nor antagonized the CCh-induced depression of EPSP. In the human neocortex, however, NDMC failed to prevent CCh-induced decrease of the GABAB responses and directly reduced the amplitude of EPSP. These data suggest distinct effects of NDMC in rat and human at M2 and M4 mAChRs underlying presynaptic modulation of GABA and glutamate release, respectively. In particular, NDMC might be a M2 mAChR Antagonist in the rat but has no activity at this receptor in human neocortex. However, NDMC has an agonistic effect at M4 mAChR in the human but no such effect in the rat neocortex. The present study confirms that pharmacology at mAChRs can differ between species and emphasizes the need of studies in human tissue.

Figures
Products