1. Academic Validation
  2. Simultaneously Inhibiting BCL2 and MCL1 Is a Therapeutic Option for Patients with Advanced Melanoma

Simultaneously Inhibiting BCL2 and MCL1 Is a Therapeutic Option for Patients with Advanced Melanoma

  • Cancers (Basel). 2020 Aug 5;12(8):2182. doi: 10.3390/cancers12082182.
Nabanita Mukherjee 1 Carol M Amato 2 Jenette Skees 1 Kaleb J Todd 1 Karoline A Lambert 1 William A Robinson 2 Robert Van Gulick 2 Ryan M Weight 2 Chiara R Dart 2 Richard P Tobin 3 Martin D McCarter 3 Mayumi Fujita 1 4 5 David A Norris 1 4 Yiqun G Shellman 1 5
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Mail Stop 8127, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
  • 2 Division of Medical Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Mail Stop 8117, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
  • 3 Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
  • 4 Dermatology Section, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, CO 80220, USA.
  • 5 Gates Center for Regenerative Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Abstract

There is an urgent need to develop treatments for patients with melanoma who are refractory to or ineligible for immune checkpoint blockade, including patients who lack BRAF-V600E/K mutations. This is often the case in patients diagnosed with rare melanoma subtypes such as mucosal and acral melanoma. Here, we analyzed data from the cutaneous melanoma The Cancer Genome Atlas Network (TCGA) transcriptomic and proteomic databases for differential expression of Apoptosis molecules between melanomas with or without BRaf hotspot mutations. Our data indicated higher B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2 (BCL2) expression in melanoma without BRaf hotspot mutations, suggesting that BH3 mimetics, such as ABT-199 (venetoclax, a small molecule against BCL2), may be a potential therapeutic option for these patients. We explored the efficacy of combining two BH3 mimetics, ABT-199 and a myeloid cell leukemia sequence 1 (MCL1) inhibitor (S63845 or S64315/MIK665) in cutaneous, mucosal and acral melanomas, in vitro and in vivo. Our data indicate this combination induced cell death in a broad range of melanoma cell lines, including melanoma initiating cell populations, and was more potent in melanoma cells without BRAF-V600E/K mutations. Our knockdown/knockout experiments suggest that several pro-apoptotic BCL2 family members, BCL2-like 11 (Apoptosis facilitator) (Bim), phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate-induced protein 1 (NOXA) or BID, play a role in the combination-induced effects. Overall, our study supports the rationale for combining an MCL1 inhibitor with a BCL2 inhibitor as a therapeutic option in patients with advanced melanoma.

Keywords

BH3 mimetics; BRAF-WT; BRAF-mutant; melanoma; venetoclax.

Figures
Products