1. Academic Validation
  2. Structural insights into the selective recognition of RF-amide peptides by neuropeptide FF receptor 2

Structural insights into the selective recognition of RF-amide peptides by neuropeptide FF receptor 2

  • EMBO Rep. 2025 May;26(9):2413-2434. doi: 10.1038/s44319-025-00428-2.
Jeesoo Kim 1 2 Sooyoung Hong 1 Hajin Lee 3 Hyun Sik Lee 1 Chaehee Park 1 4 Jinuk Kim 1 5 Wonpil Im 6 Hee-Jung Choi 7
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
  • 2 Institute for Data Innovation in Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
  • 3 MolCube, Inc., Seoul, 06640, Republic of Korea.
  • 4 The Research Institute of Basic Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea.
  • 5 Division of Biological Science and Technology, Yonsei University, Wonju, 26493, Republic of Korea.
  • 6 Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, 18015, USA.
  • 7 Department of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea. [email protected].
Abstract

Neuropeptide FF Receptor 2 (NPFFR2), a G-protein-coupled receptor, plays a role in pain modulation and diet-induced thermogenesis. While NPFFR2 is strongly activated by neuropeptides FF (NPFFs), it shows low activity in response to RF-amide-related peptides (RFRPs), despite the peptides belonging to a shared family. In contrast, NPFFR1, which shares high sequence similarity with NPFFR2, is activated by RFRPs and regulates reproductive hormone balance. The molecular basis for these receptor-specific interactions with their RF-amide peptides remains unclear. Here, we present cryo-electron microscopy structures of NPFFR2 in its active state bound to the agonist RF-amide peptide hNPSF, and in its ligand-free state. Structural analysis reveals that the C-terminal RF-amide moiety engages conserved residues in the transmembrane domain, while the N-terminal segment interacts in a receptor subtype-specific manner. Key selectivity-determining residues in NPFFR2 are also identified. A homology model of NPFFR1 bound to RFRP, supported by mutagenesis studies, further validates this selectivity mechanism. Additionally, structural comparison between the inactive and active states of NPFFR2 suggests a TM3-mediated activation mechanism. These findings provide insights into RF-amide peptide recognition by NPFF receptors.

Keywords

Ligand Selectivity; Neuropeptide FF Receptors; RF-amide Peptide; cryo-EM Structure.

Figures