1. Academic Validation
  2. A comparative in vitro analysis of pannexin1-targeting agents

A comparative in vitro analysis of pannexin1-targeting agents

  • Biochem Pharmacol. 2026 Mar:245:117688. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2026.117688.
Daan Peeters 1 Debora Iaculli 2 Steven Ballet 2 Nick Devoogdt 3 Timo W M De Groof 3 Mathieu Vinken 4 Raf Van Campenhout 1
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Entity of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels 1090, Belgium.
  • 2 Research Group of Organic Chemistry, Departments of Chemistry and Bioengineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels 1050, Belgium.
  • 3 Molecular Imaging and Therapy Research Group, Department of Imaging and Physical Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels 1090, Belgium.
  • 4 Entity of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels 1090, Belgium. Electronic address: [email protected].
Abstract

Pannexin1 channels mediate paracrine signaling and have recently emerged as key players in several inflammatory diseases. Although pannexin1 channel inhibition could represent a novel strategy for inflammatory disease treatment, therapeutic pannexin1 channel targeting is impeded by the lack of specific and potent inhibitors. To counteract this, we introduced nanobody-based inhibitors of pannexin1 channels. As previously demonstrated, the pannexin1-targeting nanobodies hold great promise as anti-inflammatory agents, yet this should be further tested. By using an in vitro approach, we continued the evaluation of the nanobodies by comparing their ability to bind and block pannexin1 channel activity with established pannexin1-binding compounds and pannexin1 channel inhibitors, respectively. Nanobodies directed to pannexin1 outperformed tested antibodies in terms of affinity towards human pannexin1 proteins, with their binding capacity being strongly linked to the extracellular loop regions of the pannexin1 protein, in an ELISA-based experimental setup. Moreover, the inhibitory effects of small molecule, peptide and nanobody-based inhibitors of pannexin1 channels were assessed by measurement of extracellular ATP release and intracellular YO-PRO1 uptake. Thus, carbenoxolone, probenecid, 10Panx1 and pannexin1-targeting nanobodies achieved blocking effects by reducing both ATP release and YO-PRO1 uptake. Collectively, the nanobodies show inhibitory effects by using smaller concentrations than traditional pannexin1 channel inhibitors. Therefore, nanobodies offer unique features for the development of pannexin1 channel inhibitors as novel anti-inflammatory therapeutics.

Keywords

Apoptosis; Inflammation; Nanobody; Pannexin1; Pharmacology; Therapy.

Figures
Products