1. Academic Validation
  2. In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, cefiderocol, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam against clinical strains of the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex

In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, cefiderocol, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam against clinical strains of the Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex

  • PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0298577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298577.
Braulio Josué Méndez-Sotelo 1 Mónica Delgado-Beltrán 2 Melissa Hernández-Durán 3 Claudia Adriana Colín-Castro 3 José Esquivel-Bautista 4 Sandra Angélica Ortega-Oliva 4 Jossue Ortiz-Álvarez 5 Rodolfo García-Contreras 6 Rafael Franco-Cendejas 7 Luis Esau Lopez Jacome 3 8
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Infectious Diseases Division, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • 2 Infectious Diseases Department, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • 3 Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Infectious Diseases Division, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • 4 Centro Nacional de Referencia de Inocuidad y Bioseguridad Agroalimentaria, Servicio Nacional de Sanidad, Inocuidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria (SENASICA), Tecámac, Mexico State, Mexico.
  • 5 Programa "Investigadoras e Investigadores por México", Consejo Nacional de Humanidades, Ciencias y Tecnologías (CONAHCYT), Mexico City, Mexico.
  • 6 Medicine Faculty, Bacteriology Laboratory, Microbiology and Parasitology Department, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • 7 Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación Luis Guillermo Ibarra Ibarra, Biomedical Research Subdirection, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • 8 Chemistry Faculty, Biology Department, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Abstract

Background: Infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and related species are increasing worldwide. Unfortunately, treatment options are limited, whereas the antimicrobial resistance is increasing.

Methods: We included clinical isolates identified as S. maltophilia by VITEK 2 Compact. Ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam, cefiderocol, quinolones, and Tetracycline family members were evaluated by broth microdilution method and compared with first-line treatment drugs. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were reported for all Antibiotics. We sequenced the Whole Genome of cefiderocol resistant strains (CRSs) and annotated their genes associated with cefiderocol resistance (GACR). Presumptive phylogenetic identification employing the 16S marker was performed.

Results: One hundred and one clinical strains were evaluated, sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, levofloxacin and minocycline showed susceptibilities of 99.01%, 95.04% and 100% respectively. Ceftazidime was the Antibiotic with the highest percentage of resistance in all samples (77.22%). Five strains were resistant to cefiderocol exhibiting MIC values ≥ 2 μg/mL (4.95%). The β-lactamase inhibitors meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam, failed to inhibit S. maltophilia, preserving both MIC50 and MIC90 ≥64 μg/mL. Ceftazidime/avibactam restored the activity of ceftazidime decreasing the MIC range. Tigecycline had the lowest MIC range, MIC50 and MIC90. Phylogeny based on 16S rRNA allowed to identify to cefiderocol resistant strains as putative species clustered into Stenotrophomonas maltophilia complex (Smc). In these strains, we detected GARCs such as Mutiple Drug Resistance (MDR) efflux pumps, L1-type β-lactamases, iron transporters and type-1 fimbriae.

Conclusion: Antimicrobial resistance to first-line treatment is low. The in vitro activity of new β-lactamase inhibitors against S. maltophilia is poor, but avibactam may be a potential option. Cefiderocol could be considered as a potential new option for multidrug resistant infections. Tetracyclines had the best in vitro activity of all Antibiotics evaluated.

Figures
Products