KRAS Mutations and Cancer
KRAS mutations commonly occur in
NSCLC,
colorectal cancer (CRC), and
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)[1-2]. The KRAS activating mutations most commonly occur as single nucleotide substitutions in 4 hotspot codons – 12, 13, 61 and 146. Codon 12 is the most frequently mutation, with the G12D mutation generally the most prevalent, followed by G12V, G12C, and others
[2-3]. The G12C mutation inhibits the binding between GAP and KRAS, thereby suppressing GTP hydrolysis and locking the G12C mutated KRAS in its active state. Active KRAS induces signal transduction via the MAPK and PI3K pathways, promoting cell proliferation, growth, and survival, thereby facilitating tumor development
[1,4]. The KRAS G12V variant mutation is the second most prevalent oncogenic alteration in KRAS-driven cancers, inducing aberrant activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and promoting tumorigenesis and metastasis.
Figure. 1. Frequency of RAS mutations in major cancer types[5].
A.Distribution of KRAS (green), HRAS (yellow), and NRAS (pink) mutation frequencies across the major cancer types. B. Most frequently mutated amino acids (>5%) in KRAS-mutated cancers: top, NSCLC; middle, PDAC; bottom, CRC.
KRAS is a GTPase that belongs to the Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene family (RAS), with the ability to hydrolyze GTP into GDP. Under normal physiological conditions, KRAS oscillates between an inactive GDP-bound state and an active GTP-bound state, transducing signals from outside the cell to the inside. Upon activation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) bind with KRAS, facilitating the replacement of bound guanosine diphosphate (GDP) with GTP, switching KRAS to its active state[6]. Meanwhile, GAPs maintain KRAS in an inactive state by strengthening the bond between GDP and KRAS.
Figure. 2. RAS signaling pathway[5].
Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) facilitate the activation of RAS proteins by promoting the exchange of GDP for GTP via GEFs, such as SOS1. Active RAS drives numerous pro-oncogenic pathways.
Successfully Targeting KRAS G12C
KRAS is small and has a considerably smooth and shallow surface, resulting in difficulty of small molecule binding to the KRAS. There is no other pocket on the surface of KRAS that can bind to small molecules except the GTP binding pocket, but targeting the GTP binding pocket is quite difficult[1]. Thus, KRAS has long been considered an 'undruggable' target. The discovery of the switch-II pocket has led to the development of specific KRASG12C inhibitors for clinical use. Among them, Sotorasib and Adagrasib were approved by the FDA in 2021 and 2022, respectively. Fulzerasib received its first approval in 2024 in China. All these drugs are used for the treatment of KRASG12C mutation-positive NSCLC.
Both Sotorasib and Adagrasib monotherapy exhibited significantly lower objective response rate (ORR) in CRC compared with NSCLC. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activation was identified as a basis for the lower response in CRC, with additional EGFR inhibition together with BRAF inhibitor treatment overcoming this issue[7]. Combining Sotorasib with Panitumumab (a EGFR inhibitor) improved progression-free survival (PFS) to 5.6 months compared with 2.2 months for the group of KRASG12C mutated advanced CRC patients receiving trifluridine-tipiracil or regorafenib[8]. A similar improvement in ORR (30.2%) was observed with Adagrasib in combination with Cetuximab (a EGFR inhibitor)[9]. Based on these findings, the FDA granted accelerated approval in 2024 to this combination therapy for KRASG12C mutated CRC.
In addition, several pan-RAS inhibitors are currently being developed. Boehringer Ingelheim announced a SOS1 inhibitor, BI-1701963, that disrupts SOS1-mediated nucleotide exchange of KRAS. Besides, given an integral role played by SHP2 in KRAS activation, several SHP2 inhibitors, such as TNO155,
RMC-4630, and JAB-3068, are now being tested in clinical trials
[10].
Table 1. FDA-approved KRASG12C inhibitor clinical trials.
| Phase |
Clinical trial number |
Drugs |
Cancer |
ORR(%) |
DCR(%) |
PFS
(months) |
OS
(months) |
Refs |
| I |
NCT03600883 |
Sotorasib |
NSCLC |
32.0 |
88.1 |
6.3 |
N/A |
[11,17] |
| CRC |
N/A |
73.8 |
4.0 |
N/A |
[17] |
| II |
NSCLC |
37.1 |
80.6 |
6.8 |
12.5 |
[11] |
| I/II |
NCT04185883 |
Sotorasib + Panitumumab |
CRC |
30.0 |
92.5 |
5.7 |
15.2 |
[12] |
| III |
NCT05198934 |
Sotorasib + Panitumumab |
CRC |
30.2 |
71.7 |
5.6 |
N/A |
[8,13] |
| I/II |
NCT03785249 |
Adagrasib |
Solid tumor |
35.1 |
86.0 |
7.4 |
14.0 |
[14] |
| Adagrasib |
NSCLC |
42.9 |
86.0 |
6.5 |
12.6 |
[11,15] |
| Adagrasib |
PDAC |
33.3 |
81.0 |
5.4 |
8.0 |
[14] |
| Adagrasib + Cetuximab |
CRC |
46.0 |
100 |
6.9 |
13.4 |
[16] |
| I |
NCT04449874 |
Divarasib (GDC-6036) + Migoprotafib (GDC-1971) |
NSCLC |
43.8 |
/ |
15.2 |
/ |
[18] |
Abbreviations: objective response rate (ORR); progression-free survival (PFS); disease control rate (DCR); overall survival (OS).
Advances in KRAS G12D Inhibitors
Due to the high prevalence of the other KRAS mutations, the development of other mutant-selective inhibitors as well as pan-KRAS inhibitors is ongoing and some of these novel KRAS inhibitors are being tested in clinical trials. In particular, KRASG12D has emerged as a key area of interest in the development of new inhibitors, since this mutation represents ~28% of all KRAS mutations and is the most prevalent mutation in both CRC and PDAC[5]. Currently, there are no FDA-approved KRASG12D selective inhibitors, and cancers with KRASG12D mutations represent a significant unmet medical need.
Figure. 3. Clinical stages of RAS inhibitors[5].
The KRASG12C inhibitors covalently bind to the cysteine residue in the KRASG12C mutant, stabilizing the protein in its inactive GDP-bound state. Unfortunately, this strategy does not apply to KRASG12D. Because Asp12 of KRASG12D has a carboxyl group, it is weaker nucleophilic than the sulfhydryl group of cysteine[2]. This difference results in compounds, such as MRTX849, with significant effects on KRASG12C, but not on KRASG12D.
Due to the inability to directly target KRAS
G12D, Mirati Therapeutics modified the structure of MRTX849 by replacing the acrylamide group with piperazine, enabling non-covalent binding through intermolecular ionic interactions. This led to the development of
MRTX1133[2-3]. The piperazine group of MRTX1133 forms ionic bonds with aspartic acid to achieve non-covalent binding. The non-covalent binding of MRTX1133 to KRAS
G12D prevents nucleotide exchange and binding of effector RAF, thereby inhibiting the protein-protein interaction necessary for the activation of KRAS downstream pathways
[2-3]. Since the overall design of MRTX-1133 was based on MRTX849, other cancer drugs targeting G12C can also be modified to be reactive against G12D-driven cancers.
Figure. 4. Structures of KRAS surfaces targeted by KRAS mutant inhibitors[2].
A. Switch-II pocket (purple) of KRAS (G12C) bound to AMG510. B. MRTX1133 with KRAS G12D/GDP.
The development strategy of
Zoldonrasib (RMC-9805) is different from that of MRTX1133. RMC-9805 first forms a non-covalent bond between KRAS
G12D and cyclophilin-A, forming a tri-complex of KRAS, cyclophilin-A, and RMC-9805, which results in slow covalent binding of RMC-9805 to the mutated aspartic acid and blocks the irreversible downstream binding of KRAS effectors
[3,8]. This interaction causes a selective and persistent modification of KRAS
G12D by disrupting the downstream KRAS
G12D signaling effectors (e.g., RAF kinases), thus inducing apoptosis and inhibiting cell proliferation.
Among the KRASG12D PDAC patients who received at least 14 weeks of RMC-9805 treatment, the ORR was 30% (n = 12), and the DCR was 80% (n = 32)[19]. Furthermore, RMC-9805 has demonstrated excellent safety characteristics and is generally well-tolerated across different dose. These results indicate that RMC-9805 has a promising initial clinical profile.
Figure. 5. Encouraging initial antitumor activity in PDAC patients treated with RMC-9805[19].
Both MRTX1133 and RMC-9805 only bind to KRASG12D in the active (ON; GTP-bound) state. In contrast, VS-7375 (GFH375) binds to KRASG12D in both the active and inactive (OFF; GDP-bound) states. Thus, VS-7375 has the potential to more completely inhibit KRASG12D signaling and tumor growth than compounds that block KRASG12D only in the OFF state or only in the ON state. VS-7375 has demonstrated a promising anti-tumor activity in multiple KRASG12D tumor models in vivo as single agent and in combination with other anticancer therapies including cetuximab[20]. These results support the ongoing clinical evaluation of VS-7375 for treatment of patients with KRASG12D mutant cancers.
Figure. 6. Mice bearing LS513 KRAS G12D-mutant colorectal cancer cells were treated with VS7375, RMC-9805 or RMC-6263 for 28 days[20].
Figure. 7. Mice bearing LS513, AsPC-1 or LU876 KRAS G12D-mutant tumors were treated with VS-7375 or Cetuximab[20].
There is also a KRAS
G12D degrader ASP3082, which binds KRAS
G12D to a E3 Ligase to degrade the protein
[3]. Other KRAS
G12D inhibitors, including
HRS-4642, TH-Z835, JAB-22000 and ERAS-4, are also in development.
Summary
Specific KRASG12C inhibitors have changed the therapeutic landscape of KRAS-driven tumors and have benefited many patients with KRAS-mutated cancers. Unfortunately, innate and acquired resistance to KRAS inhibitors has hindered their development, making these new drugs less effective or even ineffective. As one of the common KRAS mutations, KRASG12D drives a highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and exhibits potent oncogenic potential. Therefore, the development of KRASG12D inhibitors and other pan-KRAS inhibitors is a new direction for KRAS targeted therapy.
MedChemExpress—Master of active small molecules
MCE provides abundant KRAS, SOS1, SHP2 or other related-target inhibitors for you.
| Cat. No. |
Name |
Active Indications |
Targets |
| Act to directly inhibit KRAS |
| HY-114277 |
Sotorasib |
Marketed: NSCLC (2021)
Registered: CRC
Phase III: Solid tumours
Phase I/II: Brain metastases; Pancreatic cancer
|
KRASG12C
|
| HY-130149 |
Adagrasib |
Marketed: CRC; NSCLC (2022)
Phase II: Solid tumours
Phase I: Pancreatic cancer
Preclinical: Bladder cancer
|
| HY-152848 |
Fulzerasib |
Marketed: NSCLC (2024)
Phase III: CRC
|
| HY-139612 |
Opnurasib |
Phase I/II: Solid tumours
Phase I: Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC)
|
| HY-160023 |
D3S-001 |
Phase II: CRC; NSCLC ; Pancreatic cancer
Phase I/II: Solid tumours
|
| HY-145928 |
Divarasib |
Phase III: NSCLC
Phase I: Breast cancer; Solid tumours
|
| HY-143589 |
Glecirasib |
Preregistration: NSCLC
Phase II: CRC; Pancreatic cancer
Phase I/II: Intestinal cancer; Solid tumours
|
| HY-158107 |
BBO-8520 |
Phase I: NSCLC
|
| HY-134813 |
MRTX1133 |
Phase I/II: Solid tumours
Preclinical: Multiple myeloma; Pancreatic cancer
|
KRASG12D
|
| HY-159127 |
HRS-4642 |
Phase I/II: Pancreatic cancer; Solid tumours
|
| HY-156819 |
Zoldonrasib |
Phase I: Solid tumours
|
| HY-173637 |
AZD0022 |
Phase I/II: Solid tumours
|
| HY-156498 |
RMC-7977 |
N/A |
Pan-KRAS |
| HY-153724 |
BI-2865 |
N/A |
| HY-153723 |
BI-2493 |
N/A |
| HY-148439 |
RMC-6236 |
Phase III: Adenocarcinoma; Non-small cell lung cancer
Phase I/II: Pancreatic cancer
Phase I: Solid tumours
|
| Targeted regulation of KRAS active protein |
| HY-125817 |
BI-3406 |
N/A |
SOS1 |
| HY-114398 |
BAY-293 |
N/A |
| HY-134885 |
RMC-0331 |
N/A |
| HY-145926 |
MRTX0902 |
Phase I/II: Solid tumours |
| HY-136173 |
Batoprotafib |
Phase II: Solid tumours |
SHP2 |
| HY-141523 |
RMC-4630 |
Phase II: NSCLC
Phase I/II: CRC; Solid tumours
|
| HY-161952 |
JAB-3312 |
Phase III: NSCLC
Phase I/II: Solid tumours |
| HY-144903 |
Migoprotafib |
Phase I: NSCLC; Solid tumours |
References
[1] Huang, Lamei et al. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021 Nov 15;6(1):386.
[2] Zhu, Chunxiao et al. Mol Cancer. 2022 Aug 4;21(1):159.
[Content
Brief]
[3] Zeissig, Mara N et al. Trends Cancer. 2023 Nov;9(11):955-967.
[4] O'Sullivan, Éabha et al. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 7;15(6):1635.
[5] Isermann, Tamara et al. Trends Cancer. 2025 Feb;11(2):91-116.
[6] Toribio, María Luisa, and Sara González-García. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 10;24(2):1383.
[7] Prahallad, Anirudh et al. Nature. 2012 Jan 26;483(7387):100-3.
[Content
Brief]
[8] Fakih, Marwan G et al. N Engl J Med. 2023 Dec 7;389(23):2125-2139.
[9] Yaeger, Rona et al. Cancer Discov. 2024 Jun 3;14(6):982-993.
[10] Hofmann, Marco H et al. Cancer Discov. 2022 Apr 1;12(4):924-937.
[11] Zhang, Shannon S et al. Lung Cancer (Auckl). 2023 Apr 19;14:27-30.
[12] Kuboki, Yasutoshi et al. Nat Med. 2024 Jan;30(1):265-270.
[13] Pietrantonio, Filippo et al. J Clin Oncol. 2025 Apr 11:JCO2402026.
[14] Shubham Pant et al. JCO 41, 425082-425082(2023).
[15] Jänne, Pasi A et al. N Engl J Med. 2022 Jul 14;387(2):120-131.
[16] Yaeger, Rona et al. N Engl J Med. 2023 Jan 5;388(1):44-54.
[17] Hong, David S et al. N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 24;383(13):1207-1217.
[18] Luo, Ziwei et al. Cancer Res. 2025 Jan 2;85(1):101-117.
[Content
Brief]
[19] Pancreatic Cancer Update. Retrieved October 25, 2024.
[20] VS-7375 (GFH375): An oral, selective KRAS G12D (ON/OFF) inhibitor with potent anti-tumor efficacy as single agent and in combination with other anticancer therapies in preclinical models.