Optic atrophy
Definition:
References:
-
[1]. Bianca Hartmann, et al. Homozygous YME1L1 mutation causes mitochondriopathy with optic atrophy and mitochondrial network fragmentation. Elife. 2016 Aug 6;5:e16078. [Content Brief]
[2]. Claire Angebault, et al. Recessive Mutations in RTN4IP1 Cause Isolated and Syndromic Optic Neuropathies. Am J Hum Genet. 2015 Nov 5;97(5):754-60. [Content Brief]
[3]. Leonardo Caporali, et al. ATPase Domain AFG3L2 Mutations Alter OPA1 Processing and Cause Optic Neuropathy. Ann Neurol. 2020 Jul;88(1):18-32. [Content Brief]
[4]. Massimo Zeviani, et al. OPA1 mutations and mitochondrial DNA damage: keeping the magic circle in shape. Brain. 2008 Feb;131(Pt 2):314-7. [Content Brief]
[5]. Metodi Dimitrov Metodiev, et al. Mutations in the tricarboxylic acid cycle enzyme, aconitase 2, cause either isolated or syndromic optic neuropathy with encephalopathy and cerebellar atrophy. J Med Genet. 2014 Dec;51(12):834-8. [Content Brief]
[6]. Nicole J Van Bergen, et al. Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation compensation may preserve vision in patients with OPA1-linked autosomal dominant optic atrophy. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21347. [Content Brief]
[7]. Patrick Yu-Wai-Man, et al. Mitochondrial optic neuropathies - disease mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2011 Mar;30(2):81-114. [Content Brief]
[8]. Sylvain Hanein, et al. TMEM126A, encoding a mitochondrial protein, is mutated in autosomal-recessive nonsyndromic optic atrophy. Am J Hum Genet. 2009 Apr;84(4):493-8. [Content Brief]
[9]. Sylvie Gerber, et al. Mutations in DNM1L, as in OPA1, result in dominant optic atrophy despite opposite effects on mitochondrial fusion and fission. Brain. 2017 Oct 1;140(10):2586-2596. [Content Brief]
[10]. Valentina Del Dotto, et al. SSBP1 mutations cause mtDNA depletion underlying a complex optic atrophy disorder. J Clin Invest. 2020 Jan 2;130(1):108-125. [Content Brief]
[11]. Valerio Carelli, et al. Retinal ganglion cell neurodegeneration in mitochondrial inherited disorders. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 May;1787(5):518-28. [Content Brief]