costs

The discovery of hit molecule is a cornerstone of drug development. Among the diverse tools available, DNA-encoded libraries have emerged a revolutionary platform for high-throughput screening. Compared with traditional HTS, DEL features shorter screening processes, lower costs, simpler assays, and larger library capacities.

DEL Construction utilizes split-and-pool synthesis, a combinatorial chemistry approach that involves iterative splitting, reaction, and pooling. This strategy enables rapid, exponential assembly of fragments in minimal steps without the need for individual compound synthesis andassoicicated isolation or purification steps, thus greatly reducing overall costs. The technology enables simultaneous affinity screeningof massive compound collections to target proteins in a single step. By coupling chemical structures with unique DNA barcodes, each compound is tagged with a distinct DNA sequence for convenient tracking and decoding.DELs readily enable the construction and efficient screening of libraries containing millions to billions of compounds. As a result, DEL screening combines the dual advantages of high efficiency and low cost, making DEL a transformative technology in modern drug discovery.

The DEL kit consists of 50 independent libraries with a total scale of 100 billion compounds. It is constructed through stepwise combinatorial chemistry strategies involving 2-, 3-, and 4-round synthesis. By employing diverse scaffolds and flexible linking strategies, it encompasses various ring systems, linear frameworks, and heterocyclic structures. Screening can be achieved solely through affinity, independent of target-specific activity detection methods. This library is suitable for DEL screening against a wide range of targets.

A diverse compound library with favorable ADMET properties (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity) is crucial in drug discovery. Early evaluation of ADMET properties allows for the exclusion of molecules with unfavorable profiles at the initial stages, thereby reducing the risk of late-stage development failures, lowering R&D costs, and accelerating optimization of lead compounds. Based on predictions from ADMET-related AI algorithms, the compounds in this library are predicted to exhibit favorable oral bioavailability (F > 30%), reasonable plasma protein binding (PPB < 98%), minimized CYP3A4 inhibition potential (inhibition probability < 50%, CYP3A4 is the most critical drug-metabolizing enzyme in the cytochrome P450 family) , low toxicity profiles, with 140 potentially toxic substructures pre-identified and excluded via substructure searching to eliminate compounds containing hazardous fragments. The diversity library enables broad applicability in high-throughput screening (HTS) and high-content screening (HCS).

Cosmetics are complex mixtures formulated through the rational blending and processing of various natural, synthetic, or extracted raw materials. The ingredients used in cosmetics are diverse in type and functionality. Based on their properties and applications, cosmetic ingredients can generally be classified into two main categories: base materials and auxiliary ingredients. The former constitutes the primary component of cosmetics, accounting for a significant proportion in formulations and serving as the key functional substances. Auxiliary ingredients, on the other hand, play roles in shaping the product, ensuring stability, or imparting color, fragrance, and other specific characteristics.Establishing a systematic ingredient database is of great significance for cosmetic research and development. By analyzing the physicochemical properties (such as oil-water partition coefficients and molecular weight distribution), biological activity mechanisms (such as antioxidant pathways and cellular signaling regulation), and compatibility of ingredients, the database can provide precise guidance for formulation design. This approach helps shorten the development cycle of cosmetic/skincare products and reduces trial-and-error costs.

MCE offers 626 types of cosmetic ingredient compounds, including antioxidants, humectants, emulsifiers, film-forming agents, and more.

The MCE 1K Drug Fragment Library consists of 1,387 drug fragments. These drug fragments are derived from 2,946 FDA-approved drug molecules, and fragments from one drug can appear in other drugs, so these fragments are somewhat correlated with good PK/PD properties. Fragment-based screening can reserve enough chemical space for subsequent structural optimization. This compound library is an essential tool for drug screening based on FBDD (Fragment-Based Drug Discovery).

In drug discovery and development (R&D) area, target binding and druggability optimization are core processes. Among these attributes, high solubility is critical for a compound to achieve druggability, as it directly impacts the progress of drug R&D. Superior solubility ensures the rapid dissolution and uniform distribution of drug molecules in vivo, thereby enhancing bioavailability and effectively mitigating issues such as suboptimal efficacy, increased dosage requirements, or exacerbated toxic and side effects arising from insufficient solubility.

From the perspective of medicinal chemistry, high-solubility drug fragments serve as high-quality "molecular building blocks". Based on these fragments, lead compounds with potential druggability can be rapidly screened out, which significantly shortens the drug R&D cycle and reduces R&D costs. Meanwhile, the high-solubility drug fragment library can provide diverse options for drug development in different therapeutic areas, offer solutions for the solubility defects of existing clinical drugs, and facilitate the development of novel, highly effective targeted drugs with higher bioavailability and better safety profiles.

MCE has collected and compiled 2,527 experimentally validated small-molecule fragments with high solubility. These fragments can be directly used for drug molecular design, providing high-quality pre-validated solubility fragments that significantly improve the efficiency of lead compound screening and accelerate the progress of drug R&D.

Withdrawal or delisting drugs refer to drugs that are recalled or discontinued from the market due to low efficiency, serious side effects, financial and regulatory problems and other reasons. Once the drug is withdrawn from the market, it will cause heavy losses to the original research company that invested a lot of time, finance and other costs to develop the drug.

Adverse drug reaction (ADR) is the main reason for drug withdrawal from the market. ADR refers to the unexpected effects caused by the reasons such as the target-directed interaction during the treatment. However, studying the mechanism of these ADRs may just be a breakthrough in finding new indications. For example, thalidomide, the protagonist of the drug damage event that caused numerous "seal babies" deformed infants, was found to be due to the degradation of a transcription factor - SALL4 after delisting, which made thalidomide have a new clinical application. In 1998, it was approved by FDA for the treatment of leprosy nodular erythema, and in 2006, it was approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma. ADR study of delisted drugs can not only avoid the loss of drug development in advance but also bring hope to new indications.

MCE has sorted out 232 drug compounds withdrawn from the market through FDA, EMA and other authoritative platforms. Each compound has withdrawal records in at least one country/market. It is a useful tool for conducting research on drug side effects or drug toxicity mechanisms and discovering new indications of drugs.