Protocol for Sucrose Preference Test (SPT)
Materials Required
Principle
The Sucrose Preference Test is a rodent two-bottle choice assay used to estimate reward-related behavior by measuring preference for a sweet sucrose solution over water. Reduced sucrose preference is commonly interpreted as an anhedonia-like phenotype in stress-based depression models, but it can also be affected by thirst, hunger, body weight, learning, motivation, and general fluid intake[1][2][3][4][5][6][7].
MCE has not independently verified the accuracy of these methods. They are for reference only.
Experimental Materials
• Drinking water is used as the comparison fluid in the two-bottle choice test[1][2][3].
• Vehicle or untreated control condition is used as the negative control in pharmacological or stress-model experiments[2][3][4].
• Antidepressant treatment may be used as a positive control when testing reversibility of stress-induced sucrose preference deficits[2][4][8].
• Mice or rats are used depending on the model; species, strain, sex, body weight, stress history, housing condition, and feeding status should be reported because they affect sucrose intake and preference[1][3][5][6][7][9].
Equipment and instruments
• Use two drinking bottles per cage or animal, bottle holders that allow simultaneous access, a balance or graduated measurement method to quantify fluid intake, cages suitable for individual measurement when individual intake is required, and data sheets or software for calculating preference[1][3].Controls
• Use water-only or vehicle-treated controls, non-stressed controls for stress models, and antidepressant-treated positive controls when testing rescue of stress-induced anhedonia-like behavior[2][4][8].Experimental Procedure
Preparation Steps
• Before testing, habituate animals to the two-bottle setup and sucrose solution when required by the selected protocol, because novelty, side bias, and learning can influence measured preference[1][3][7].• Prepare two bottles for each test unit: one containing sucrose solution and one containing water; record starting bottle weights or volumes before placement[1][3].
• Avoid long food or water deprivation unless it is the specific variable under study, because deprivation can confound sucrose preference by adding hunger and thirst drives[5][6].
• Randomize or alternate bottle positions across the test to reduce side preference bias[1][3].
Operation Steps
• Place the sucrose bottle and water bottle on the cage simultaneously and allow the animal free access for the predefined test period; published protocols include short tests and overnight or multi-day testing, so the selected duration should be reported explicitly and kept identical across groups[1][2][3][5].• At the end of the test, remove bottles and measure remaining sucrose solution and water by weight or volume to calculate intake[1][3].
• Measure total fluid intake as well as sucrose intake, because reduced sucrose preference may reflect altered total drinking rather than reduced reward sensitivity[1][5][6].
• Record body weight when interpreting sucrose intake, because body weight and metabolic status can influence consumption[5][6][9]• Data Acquisition and Analysis
Calculate sucrose preference as: sucrose intake / (sucrose intake + water intake) × 100%[1][3].
• Analyze sucrose preference together with sucrose intake, water intake, total fluid intake, body weight, stress condition, sex, and treatment group[5][6][7][9].
• Use the individual animal as the biological replicate when intake is measured individually; if animals are group-housed during testing, the cage rather than the individual animal is the measured unit unless individual drinking is tracked[1][3].
• Interpret reduced sucrose preference cautiously, because recent studies show that SPT performance can reflect non-hedonic processes such as metabolic drive, learning, motivation, choice behavior, or altered fluid intake[5][6][7].
Troubleshooting
Problem: Sucrose preference decreases after fasting or water restriction.
Possible Cause: Hunger and thirst drives can confound reward-related interpretation.Literature-supported Solution: Avoid long deprivation unless experimentally required, and report feeding and water-access conditions clearly[5][6].
Problem: Sucrose preference changes but total fluid intake also changes.
Possible Cause: The phenotype may reflect altered drinking, metabolic state, or body weight rather than anhedonia.Literature-supported Solution: Report sucrose intake, water intake, total intake, and body weight, not preference percentage alone[5][6][9].
Problem: Animals consistently drink from one side.
Possible Cause: Side bias can distort two-bottle preference results.Literature-supported Solution: Alternate or randomize bottle positions during testing[1][3].
Problem: SPT results do not align with other depression-like behavioral outcomes.
Possible Cause: SPT reflects multiple behavioral components, including reward sensitivity, learning, motivation, and choice.Literature-supported Solution: Interpret SPT alongside complementary behavioral assays rather than as a standalone measure of depression-like behavior[6][7].
References:
- [1]. Liu MY, et al. Sucrose preference test for measurement of stress-induced anhedonia in mice. Nat Protoc. 2018;13(7):1686-1698. [Content Brief]
- [2]. Katz RJ. Animal model of depression: pharmacological sensitivity of a hedonic deficit. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1982;16(6):965-968. [Content Brief]
- [3]. Eagle AL, et al. Sucrose preference test to measure stress-induced anhedonia. Bio Protoc. 2016;6(11):e1822.
- [4]. Willner P, et al. Reduction of sucrose preference by chronic unpredictable mild stress, and its restoration by a tricyclic antidepressant. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1987;93(3):358-364. [Content Brief]
- [5]. Berrio JP, et al. Reliability of sucrose preference testing following short or no food and water deprivation-a systematic review and meta-analysis of rat models of chronic unpredictable stress. Transl Psychiatry. 2024;14(1):39.
- [6]. Remus JL, et al. Interaction of metabolic stress with chronic mild stress in altering brain cytokines and sucrose preference. Behav Neurosci. 2015;129(3):321-330. [Content Brief]
- [7]. Verharen JPH, et al. A computational analysis of mouse behavior in the sucrose preference test. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):2419.
- [8]. Matthews K, et al. Sucrose consumption as an hedonic measure following chronic unpredictable mild stress. Physiol Behav. 1995;57(2):241-248. [Content Brief]
- [9]. Forbes NF, et al. Chronic mild stress and sucrose consumption: validity as a model of depression. Physiol Behav. 1996;60(6):1481-1484. [Content Brief]