Urelumab alone or in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma

  • Am J Hematol. 2020 May;95(5):510-520. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25757.
John Timmerman  1 Charles Herbaux  2 Vincent Ribrag  3 Andrew D Zelenetz  4 Roch Houot  5  6 Sattva S Neelapu  7 Theodore Logan  8 Izidore S Lossos  9 Walter Urba  10 Gilles Salles  11 Radhakrishnan Ramchandren  12 Caron Jacobson  13 John Godwin  10 Cecilia Carpio  14 Deanne Lathers  15 Yali Liu  15 Jaclyn Neely  15 Satyendra Suryawanshi  15 Yoshinobu Koguchi  10 Ronald Levy  16
Affiliations
  • 1. UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
  • 2. Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Lille, France.
  • 3. Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
  • 4. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • 5. CHU Rennes, Service Hématologie Clinique, Rennes, France.
  • 6. INSERM, Unité d'Investigation Clinique, Rennes, France.
  • 7. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  • 8. Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • 9. University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida.
  • 10. Earle A. Chiles Research Institute, Providence Cancer Center, Portland, Oregon.
  • 11. Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
  • 12. Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, Michigan.
  • 13. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • 14. Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • 15. Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey.
  • 16. Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Abstract

Urelumab, a fully human, non-ligand binding, CD137 agonist IgG4 monoclonal antibody, enhances T-cell and natural killer-cell antitumor activity in preclinical models, and may enhance cytotoxic activity of rituximab. Here we report results in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and Other B-cell lymphomas, in phase 1 studies evaluating urelumab alone (NCT01471210) or combined with rituximab (NCT01775631). Sixty patients received urelumab (0.3 mg/kg IV Q3W, 8 mg IV Q3W, or 8 mg IV Q6W); 46 received urelumab (0.1 mg/kg, 0.3 mg/kg, or 8 mg IV Q3W) plus rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV QW. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of urelumab was determined to be 0.1 mg/kg or 8 mg Q3W after a single event of potential drug-induced liver injury occurred with urelumab 0.3 mg/kg. Treatment-related AEs were reported in 52% (urelumab: grade 3/4, 15%) and 72% (urelumab + rituximab: grade 3/4, 28%); three led to discontinuation (grade 3 increased AST, grade 4 acute hepatitis [urelumab]; one death from sepsis syndrome [urelumab plus rituximab]). Objective response rates/disease control rates were 6%/19% (DLBCL, n = 31), 12%/35% (FL, n = 17), and 17%/42% (Other B-cell lymphomas, n = 12) with urelumab and 10%/24% (DLBCL, n = 29) and 35%/71% (FL, n = 17) with urelumab plus rituximab. Durable remissions in heavily pretreated patients were achieved; however, many were observed at doses exceeding the MTD. These data show that urelumab alone or in combination with rituximab demonstrated manageable safety in B-cell lymphoma, but the combination did not enhance clinical activity relative to rituximab alone or Other current standard of care.

Products