Efficacy and Safety Exposure-Response Analysis of Loncastuximab Tesirine in Patients with B cell non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

  • AAPS J. 2021 Dec 10;24(1):11. doi: 10.1208/s12248-021-00660-3.
Brian Hess  1 William Townsend  2 Weiyun Ai  3 Anastasios Stathis  4 Melhem Solh  5 Juan Pablo Alderuccio  6 David Ungar  7 Sam Liao  8 Lori Liao  8 Lisa Khouri  8 Xiaoyan Zhang  7 Joseph Boni  9
Affiliations
  • 1. Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
  • 2. University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and UCLH National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Facility, London, UK.
  • 3. Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
  • 4. Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
  • 5. Blood and Marrow Transplant Program at Northside Hospital, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • 6. Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.
  • 7. ADC Therapeutics Inc, Murray Hill, New Jersy, USA.
  • 8. Pharmax Research Inc, Irvine, California, USA.
  • 9. ADC Therapeutics Inc, Murray Hill, New Jersy, USA. [email protected].
Abstract

We developed an integrated population pharmacokinetic model to investigate loncastuximab tesirine pharmacokinetics (PK) and exposure-response relationships for relapsed/refractory B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). The model, based on the recommended dosing schedule (150 µg/kg every 3 weeks [Q3W] for 2 cycles; 75 µg/kg Q3W thereafter) and drug concentrations in phase 1 and 2 studies (DLBCL [n = 284], non-DLBCL [n = 44]), was used to characterize loncastuximab tesirine PK and evaluate exposure covariates. Relationships between exposure (pyrrolobenzodiazepine-conjugated antibody [cAb] cycle 1 average concentration) and (1) efficacy (including overall response rate [ORR; primary endpoint] and overall survival [OS]) and (2) grade ≥ 2 treatment-emergent adverse events were explored. Statistical analyses included univariate and multivariate logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and COX proportional hazard regression. cAb and total Ab were best described by a two-compartment linear model with time-dependent clearance. The cAb steady-state half-life increased to 20.6 days by ~ 15 weeks. cAb exposure was lower for low albumin, mild/moderate hepatic impairment, non-DLBCL subtypes, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scores > 1. Significant positive associations were reported between exposure and ORR (p = 3.21E-6), OS (p = 0.0016), grade ≥ 2 increased gamma-glutamyltransferase, liver function test abnormalities, pain, and skin/nail reactions (p < 0.05). Low albumin, bulky disease, and mild/moderate hepatic impairment had a significant negative effect on OS (p < 0.01). Modeling supports the recommended loncastuximab tesirine dosing schedule. Although reduced exposure and efficacy were predicted for specific covariates (e.g., low albumin, mild/moderate hepatic impairment), dose increases are not recommended. Trial registration: NCT02669017 and NCT03589469.

Keywords
Clinical; Drug conjugates; PK/PD Modeling; Pharmacodynamics; Pharmacokinetics.
Products