AR antagonist 17
AR antagonist 17 is a selective, orally active, low brain-penetrant Androgen Receptor (AR) antagonist (IC50 = 0.010 μM), effectively blocking AR dimerization and nuclear translocation, and demonstrating potent efficacy in several castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) cells. AR antagonist 17 showed superior efficacy against variant drug-resistant AR mutants. AR antagonist 17 can inhibit tumor growth in an LNCaP xenograft model without apparent toxicity. AR antagonist 17 can be used for the study of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).
For research use only. We do not sell to patients.
- CAS No.: 3064715-04-1
- Formula: C21H20F3N3O4S2
- Molecular Weight:499.53
-
Storage:
Please store the product under the recommended conditions in the Certificate of Analysis.
Biological Activity
Description
In Vitro
AR antagonist 17 (Compound C13) shows excellent AR antagonistic activity and antiproliferative effects against AR-positive PCa cell lines (LNCaP (IC50 = 1.02 μM), C4−2B (IC50 = 3.86 μM), 22RV1 (IC50 = 8.45 μM), and VCaP (IC50 = 5.72 μM)), accompanied by low toxicity on normal cell lines 3T3 and Ges-1 (IC50 > 20 μM)[1].
AR antagonist 17 (0.2-2 μM, 2 weeks) completely inhibits clonal proliferation in LNCaP cells[1].
AR antagonist 17 (0.02-2 μM, 48 h) dose-dependently suppresses the dihydrotestosterone (DHT)-induced transcriptional levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and remarkably suppresses mRNA levels of two AR-regulated downstream genes, FKBP5 and TMPRSS2 in LNCaP cells[1].
AR antagonist 17 (0.1-10 μM, 24 h) dose-dependently inhibits endogenous PSA protein expression but has no significant effect on AR protein expression in LNCaP cells[1].
AR antagonist 17 (0.1-10 μM, 4 h) inhibits DHT-induced AR dimerization in a dose-dependent manner, and completely blocks this process at 10 μM in 293T cells[1].
AR antagonist 17 (10 μM, 8 h) can cause AR to remain mainly in the cytoplasm and effectively prevent AR nuclear translocation in LNCaP cells[1].
AR antagonist 17 demonstrates excellent antagonistic activity against these clinically prevalent AR resistance mutations, ARF877L/T878A (IC50 = 0.35 μM), ARW742C (IC50 = 0.50 μM), ARF877L (IC50 = 0.070 μM)[1].
AR antagonist 17 (2 μM, 48 h) significantly suppresses eight clinically relevant PCa recurrence markers: KLK3 (encoding PSA), TMPRSS2, KLK2, NKX3.1, SLC45A3, PMEPA1, TARP, and TM4SF1, alongside cancer-related processes, apoptosis regulators STK39, HERC3, and GRIN3A in LNCaP cells[1].
AR antagonist 17 (2 μM, 48 h) significantly inhibits the expression of the pan-cancer-related biomarkers for DNA biosynthesis and repair, including EXO1, CYP11A1, PGC, RRM2, and FAM111B in LNCaP cells[1].
MedChemExpress (MCE) has not independently confirmed the accuracy of these methods. They are for reference only. Further protocols information, click here.
-
Cell Line:LNCaP cells
-
Concentration:0.2 μM, 2 μM
-
Incubation Time:2 week
-
Result:Inhibited clonal proliferation at a concentration of 2.0 μM, showing better inhibitory activity against clonal proliferation than Enz 0.2 μM.
-
Cell Line:LNCaP cells
-
Concentration:0.1 Μm, 1 μM, 10 μM
-
Incubation Time:24 h
-
Result:Inhibited endogenous PSA protein expression but had no significant effect on AR protein expression in LNCaP cells.
-
Cell Line:LNCaP cells
-
Concentration:0.02 μM, 0.2 μM, 2 μM
-
Incubation Time:48 h
-
Result:Suppressed the DHT-induced transcriptional levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and remarkably suppressed mRNA levels of two AR-regulated downstream genes, FKBP5 and TMPRSS2.
-
Cell Line:LNCaP cells
-
Concentration:10 μM
-
Incubation Time:8 h
-
Result:Effectively inhibited DHT-induced AR nuclear translocation; AR mainly remains in the cytoplasm.
-
Cell Line:LNCaP cells
-
Concentration:2 μM
-
Incubation Time:48 h
-
Result:Significantly suppressed eight clinically relevant PCa recurrence markers: KLK3 (encoding PSA), TMPRSS2, KLK2, NKX3.1, SLC45A3, PMEPA1, TARP, and TM4SF1, alongside cancer-related processes, apoptosis regulators STK39, HERC3, and GRIN3A in LNCaP cells.
Significantly inhibited the expression of the pan-cancer-related biomarkers for DNA biosynthesis and repair, including EXO1, CYP11A1, PGC, RRM2, and FAM111B in LNCaP cells.
In Vivo
AR antagonist 17 (40 mg/kg, oral gavage, twice daily for 32 days) demonstrates significant tumor growth suppression throughout the treatment duration and does not induce significant body weight loss or other signs of toxicity during the experiment in CB17 SCID mice[1].
MedChemExpress (MCE) has not independently confirmed the accuracy of these methods. They are for reference only.
-
Animal Model:SD Rats[1]
-
Dosage:5.0 mg/kg
-
Administration:Oral gavage
-
Result:Had low blood-brain barrier permeability in SD Rats.
-
Animal Model:LNCaP cells (1 × 107) were implanted subcutaneously into the right flanks of the 6-week-old male CB17 SCID mice[1].
-
Dosage:40 mg/kg
-
Administration:Oral gavage, twice daily for 32 days
-
Result:The tumor growth inhibition (TGI) of AR antagonist 17 was 123.41%.
Exhibited good tolerance and did not induce significant body weight loss or other signs of toxicity during the experiment.
Chemical Information
-
CAS No. 3064715-04-1
-
Molecular Weight 499.53
-
Formula C21H20F3N3O4S2
-
SMILES
CC1=C(C=C(O1)C2=CC=CC(C(F)(F)F)=C2)C(NC3=NC(CN4CCS(=O)(CC4)=O)=CS3)=O
-
Shipping
Room temperature in continental US; may vary elsewhere.
-
Storage
Please store the product under the recommended conditions in the Certificate of Analysis.
Protocols
-
Cytoplasmic-Nuclear Fractionated Protein Extraction
Cytoplasmic-nuclear fractionated protein extraction separates soluble cytoplasmic proteins from nuclear-enriched proteins by mild plasma-membrane permeabilization, differential centrifugation, washing of nuclei, and extraction of nuclear proteins for downstream immunoblotting or related molecular analysis. The readout is the relative abundance of a protein in cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions, commonly assessed by western blotting together with compartment markers such as tubulin or pyruvate kinase for cytoplasm and lamin, nucleoporin, hnRNP, H2AX, or Lamin B for nuclear fractions.
-
Cell Cytotoxicity Assay
Cytotoxicity assays are usually based on the assessment of cell membrane damage, which can also be indirectly detected by measuring cell viability. Detection methods include MTT assay, CKK-8 assay, LDH assay and ATP assay, etc.
-
Research Protocol for Endocrine Diseases
Endocrine diseases often arise from disrupted hormone production, hormone signaling, or target-tissue responsiveness; for diabetes-focused endocrine disease models, insulin signaling regulates glucose uptake, hepatic glucose output, lipid metabolism, and β-cell compensation. Type 2 diabetes develops through interacting defects in insulin resistance, β-cell dysfunction, adipose inflammation, hepatic glucose overproduction, altered incretin signaling, and ectopic lipid metabolism. A major unresolved question is whether endocrine dysfunction is driven primarily by target-tissue insulin resistance, intrinsic β-cell failure, immune/inflammatory stress, or combined multi-organ failure that differs by disease stage.
-
Patient-Derived Xenograft (PDX)
Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models are generated by engrafting primary human tumor tissue directly into immunodeficient mice, allowing in vivo propagation of patient tumor biology without initial in vitro adaptation. These models are used to preserve key histopathological and molecular characteristics of the original tumor and enable assessment of tumor growth dynamics and therapeutic response in a living organism. The biological readout is tumor engraftment and subsequent growth in the murine host, which reflects the ability of human tumor cells to survive, vascularize, and expand in an immunocompromised microenvironment.
-
Patient-Derived Orthotopic Xenograft (PDOX)
Patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) modeling implants fresh patient tumor tissue or patient-derived tumor cells into the anatomically corresponding organ or tissue site of immunodeficient mice, usually by surgical orthotopic implantation, to preserve patient tumor histology, local microenvironmental context, invasion, metastatic behavior, and treatment-response features better than subcutaneous implantation. PDOX readouts include tumor engraftment, orthotopic tumor growth, local invasion, metastasis, recurrence after resection, histologic similarity to the donor tumor, biomarker retention, molecular concordance, survival, and response or resistance to therapy. PDOX models are used for preclinical drug testing and individualized therapy evaluation, but engraftment success varies by tumor type and specimen quality.
-
Splenic/Portal-Vein Liver Metastasis Xenograft
Splenic and portal-vein liver metastasis xenograft models deliver tumor cells into the portal circulation so that cells reach the liver first and form hepatic metastatic lesions; splenic injection uses the spleen as an access route to the portal system, while direct portal-vein injection introduces cells into the portal vein without requiring splenectomy. The assay detects liver colonization, intrahepatic tumor growth, tumor distribution, treatment response, survival, and liver-metastasis microenvironment changes; readouts include bioluminescence or fluorescence imaging, gross liver nodule counts, liver weight or tumor burden, histology, and survival.
-
Subcutaneous Cell-Line-Derived Xenograft
Subcutaneous cell-line-derived xenograft (CDX) models are established by implanting cultured human cancer cell lines into immunodeficient mice, where the injected cells form localized tumors that can be monitored in vivo as a measure of tumorigenic potential, growth kinetics, and treatment response. These models are widely used in oncology research because they allow reproducible tumor formation and enable comparative assessment of tumor growth between different cell lines or genetic manipulations in a controlled in vivo microenvironment. Subcutaneous implantation of cancer cells in immunodeficient mice is a standard approach for evaluating tumor growth behavior and therapeutic response across multiple cancer types, including prostate, esophageal, pancreatic, and colon cancer models.
-
Orthotopic Cell-Line Xenograft
Orthotopic cell-line xenograft models involve implantation of human cancer cell lines into the anatomically corresponding organ of immunodeficient mice to reproduce tumor growth within a native microenvironment, enabling more clinically relevant tumor behavior compared with subcutaneous models. These models are widely used because orthotopic placement better recapitulates tumor progression, including invasion and metastatic spread, which are often underrepresented in heterotopic implantation systems. Compared with conventional xenografts, orthotopic implantation is described as more technically complex but provides improved simulation of tumor-microenvironment interactions and metastatic behavior, making it particularly valuable for translational oncology research. Surgical orthotopic implantation approaches have been emphasized as enabling faithful reproduction of clinical cancer features, including metastasis and disease progression patterns that align with the tumor’s organ of origi
-
Intraperitoneal/Peritoneal Dissemination Xenograft
Intraperitoneal (IP) or peritoneal dissemination xenograft models are based on the introduction of human cancer cells into the peritoneal cavity of immunodeficient mice, where they attach to peritoneal surfaces, form multicellular aggregates or spheroids, and progressively generate disseminated tumor nodules that mimic advanced peritoneal metastatic disease. These models are widely used to study ovarian cancer progression, tumor-microenvironment interactions, and intraperitoneal therapeutic responses, often incorporating bioluminescence or fluorescence imaging to longitudinally monitor tumor burden in vivo. The biological principle relies on the capacity of tumor cells such as SKOV3 or related ovarian carcinoma lines to survive in suspension, aggregate within ascites-like fluid, adhere to mesothelial surfaces, and invade peritoneal organs, thereby recapitulating human peritoneal carcinomatosis patterns observed in advanced disease.
Purity & Documentation
References
Calculators
Concentration (start) × Volume (start) = Concentration (final) × Volume (final)