PHGDH-IN-7
PHGDH-IN-7 is an orally active Cys281-targeted covalent noncompetitive PHGDH inhibitor with an enzymatic IC50 of 0.8 μM, MST Kd of 3.4 μM, and Ki of 2.82 μM. PHGDH-IN-7 disrupts PHGDH homodimer formation. PHGDH-IN-7 blocks cellular de novo serine synthesis. PHGDH-IN-7 elevates intracellular ROS levels and inhibits DNA replication. PHGDH-IN-7 resensitizes EGFR-TKI-resistant lung adenocarcinoma cells. PHGDH-IN-7 suppresses triple-negative breast tumor growth with no obvious systemic toxicity. PHGDH-IN-7 serves as a tool compound for PHGDH-dependent tumor research.
For research use only. We do not sell to patients.
- Formula: C32H40N10O2
- Molecular Weight:596.73
-
Storage:
Please store the product under the recommended conditions in the Certificate of Analysis.
All DNA/RNA Synthesis Isoforms
More
Biological Activity
Description
Cellular Effect
|
Cell Line
|
Type | Value | Description | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HCC70 | IC50 |
4.8 μM
|
Inhibits the growth of HCC70 cells for 72 h.
Inhibits the growth of HCC70 cells for 72 h.
|
42284116 |
| MDA-MB-468 | IC50 |
1.8 μM
|
Inhibits the growth of MDA-MB-468 cells for 72 h.
Inhibits the growth of MDA-MB-468 cells for 72 h.
|
42284116 |
| ZR-75-1 | IC50 |
50.2 μM
|
Inhibits the growth of ZR-75-1 cells for 72 h.
Inhibits the growth of ZR-75-1 cells for 72 h.
|
42284116 |
| PC-9 | IC50 |
2.3 μM
|
Inhibits the growth of PC-9 cells for 72 h.
Inhibits the growth of PC-9 cells for 72 h.
|
42284116 |
| HCT-116 | IC50 |
5.3 μM
|
Inhibits the growth of HCT-116 cells for 72 h.
Inhibits the growth of HCT-116 cells for 72 h.
|
42284116 |
In Vitro
PHGDH-IN-7 (Compound D5-2) (72 h) exhibits potent activity against PHGDH-dependent MDA-MB-468 cells with a cellular IC50 of 1.8 μM, and displays markedly weaker anti-proliferative effects in PHGDH-independent cell lines[1].
PHGDH-IN-7 (40 μM; 3 min) effectively targets PHGDH protein in MDA-MB-468 cells[1].
PHGDH-IN-7 (1.5-3 μM; 48 h) relies primarily on PHGDH for its antiproliferative potency in MDA-MB-468 cells[1].
PHGDH-IN-7 (2.5-10 μM; 8 h) inhibits the serine synthesis in MDA-MB-468 cells[1].
PHGDH-IN-7 (2.5-10 μM; 24 h) suppresses DNA synthesis and elevates intracellular ROS levels in MDA-MB-468 cells[1].
PHGDH-IN-7 (1-5 μM; 48 h) impairs clonogenic growth of MDA-MB-468 and HCT116 cells[1].
PHGDH-IN-7 (5-20 μM; 2 weeks) preferentially inhibits colony formation of PHGDH-high HCC827ER9 cells compared to PHGDH-low parental HCC827 and HCC827OR lines[1].
PHGDH-IN-7 (1-2 μM; 48 h) restores Erlotinib (HY-50896) sensitivity to HCC827ER9 cells and produces synergistic antiproliferative effects[1].
PHGDH-IN-7 (5-10 μM; 48 h) requires higher concentrations to resensitize Osimertinib (HY-15772)-resistant HCC827OR cells[1].
MedChemExpress (MCE) has not independently confirmed the accuracy of these methods. They are for reference only. Further protocols information, click here.
-
Cell Line:MDA-MB-468 cells
-
Concentration:40 μM
-
Incubation Time:3 min
-
Result:Decreased the thermal stability of PHGDH in MDA-MB-468 cells.
-
Cell Line:MDA-MB-468 cells
-
Concentration:1.5 μM, 3 μM
-
Incubation Time:48 h
-
Result:Displayed markedly weakened inhibitory activity against MDA-MB-468 cells following PHGDH RNAi knockdown.
-
Cell Line:MDA-MB-468 cells
-
Concentration:2.5 μM, 5 μM, 10 μM
-
Incubation Time:24 h
-
Result:Suppressed DNA synthesis in MDA-MB-468 cells, as measured by EdU incorporation.
-
Cell Line:MDA-MB-468 cells, HCT116 cells
-
Concentration:1 μM, 2.5 μM, 5 μM
-
Incubation Time:48 h
-
Result:Reduced the clonogenic capacity of MDA-MB-468 and HCT116 cells.
-
Cell Line:HCC827ER9 cells, HCC827 cells, HCC827OR cells
-
Concentration:5 μM, 10 μM, 20 μM
-
Incubation Time:2 weeks
-
Result:Exhibited potent inhibition against PHGDH-high HCC827ER9 cells.
Showed weaker activity against PHGDH-low parental HCC827 and HCC827OR cells.
-
Cell Line:HCC827ER9 cells
-
Concentration:1 μM, 2 μM
-
Incubation Time:48 h
-
Result:Significantly restored Erlotinib (HY-50896) sensitivity in HCC827ER9.
-
Cell Line:HCC827OR cells
-
Concentration:5 μM, 10 μM
-
Incubation Time:48 h
-
Result:Needed higher concentrations to resensitize HCC827OR cells to Osimertinib (HY-15772).
Parmacokinetics
| Species | Dose | Route | Cmax | Tmax | T1/2 | AUC0-t | CL | Vss | MRT0-t | F |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mice[1] | 10 mg/kg | i.v. | 50390 ng/mL | 0.083 h | 0.16 h | 100763 ng/mL·h | 1.68 mL/min/kg | 24 mL/kg | 0.0033 h | / |
| Mice[1] | 30 mg/kg | i.p. | 15601 ng/mL | 0.33 h | 0.74 h | 22697 ng/mL·h | / | / | 1.14 h | 7.51 % |
| Mice[1] | 30 mg/kg | p.o. | 16929 ng/mL | 0.33 h | 0.20 h | 8545 ng/mL·h | / | / | 0.38 h | 2.83 % |
In Vivo
MedChemExpress (MCE) has not independently confirmed the accuracy of these methods. They are for reference only.
-
Animal Model:Female NOD-SCID mice bearing MDA-MB-468 triple-negative breast cancer xenografts[1]
-
Dosage:25 mg/kg, 50 mg/kg
-
Administration:i.p.; twice daily; for 21 days
-
Result:Did not cause noticeable loss in body weight, and no other signs of toxicity were observed at two dosages.
Significantly inhibited tumor size and weight.
Chemical Information
-
Molecular Weight 596.73
-
Formula C32H40N10O2
-
SMILES
CNC1=NC(N[C@H](C(N)=O)CC2=CC=C(C3=CC=C(N(C)C)N=C3)C=C2)=NC(N4CC[C@]5(CCN(C(C#CC)=O)C5)CC4)=N1
-
Shipping
Room temperature in continental US; may vary elsewhere.
-
Storage
Please store the product under the recommended conditions in the Certificate of Analysis.
Protocols
-
Cell Cytotoxicity Assay
Cytotoxicity assays are usually based on the assessment of cell membrane damage, which can also be indirectly detected by measuring cell viability. Detection methods include MTT assay, CKK-8 assay, LDH assay and ATP assay, etc.
-
PCNA Immunodetection Proliferation Assay
PCNA immunodetection measures proliferative activity by detecting proliferating cell nuclear antigen, a nuclear protein associated with DNA polymerase δ function and DNA replication. The assay readout is the proportion of PCNA-positive nuclei among total counted cells, but PCNA labeling is not identical to BrdU labeling because PCNA can mark late G1/early S-associated replication competence and may persist beyond active DNA synthesis depending on fixation and extraction conditions.
-
ROS/oxidative-stress fluorescent staining
ROS/oxidative-stress fluorescent staining uses cell-permeant fluorogenic probes that become fluorescent after oxidation inside cells or tissues; commonly used examples include DCFH-DA/DCFDA for broad cellular oxidant detection, DHE for superoxide-related signal detection, MitoSOX for mitochondrial superoxide-related signal detection, and CellROX probes for oxidative-stress-associated fluorescence readouts. The assay detects probe oxidation rather than a single ROS species unless the probe and analysis method have been chemically validated for that species. DCFH-DA enters cells, is deacetylated by intracellular esterases to DCFH, and produces fluorescent DCF after oxidation, so the readout is used as an operational measure of total cellular oxidative stress rather than a species-specific ROS measurement. DHE and MitoSOX can report superoxide-related oxidation, but red fluorescence alone can include non-specific ethidium-like oxidation products; HPLC or optimized spectral approaches are
-
Patient-Derived Xenograft (PDX)
Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models are generated by engrafting primary human tumor tissue directly into immunodeficient mice, allowing in vivo propagation of patient tumor biology without initial in vitro adaptation. These models are used to preserve key histopathological and molecular characteristics of the original tumor and enable assessment of tumor growth dynamics and therapeutic response in a living organism. The biological readout is tumor engraftment and subsequent growth in the murine host, which reflects the ability of human tumor cells to survive, vascularize, and expand in an immunocompromised microenvironment.
-
Subchronic/Chronic Toxicity Study
A subchronic/chronic oral toxicity study detects systemic adverse effects caused by repeated administration of a test article, using mortality, clinical signs, body weight, food/water intake, ophthalmology, urinalysis, hematology, serum biochemistry, organ weights, gross necropsy, and histopathology as integrated readouts. The readout reflects dose-related physiological injury, target-organ pathology, reversibility after recovery, and derivation of NOAEL, LOAEL, or related point-of-departure values when the dataset supports them.
-
Patient-Derived Orthotopic Xenograft (PDOX)
Patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) modeling implants fresh patient tumor tissue or patient-derived tumor cells into the anatomically corresponding organ or tissue site of immunodeficient mice, usually by surgical orthotopic implantation, to preserve patient tumor histology, local microenvironmental context, invasion, metastatic behavior, and treatment-response features better than subcutaneous implantation. PDOX readouts include tumor engraftment, orthotopic tumor growth, local invasion, metastasis, recurrence after resection, histologic similarity to the donor tumor, biomarker retention, molecular concordance, survival, and response or resistance to therapy. PDOX models are used for preclinical drug testing and individualized therapy evaluation, but engraftment success varies by tumor type and specimen quality.
-
Subcutaneous Cell-Line-Derived Xenograft
Subcutaneous cell-line-derived xenograft (CDX) models are established by implanting cultured human cancer cell lines into immunodeficient mice, where the injected cells form localized tumors that can be monitored in vivo as a measure of tumorigenic potential, growth kinetics, and treatment response. These models are widely used in oncology research because they allow reproducible tumor formation and enable comparative assessment of tumor growth between different cell lines or genetic manipulations in a controlled in vivo microenvironment. Subcutaneous implantation of cancer cells in immunodeficient mice is a standard approach for evaluating tumor growth behavior and therapeutic response across multiple cancer types, including prostate, esophageal, pancreatic, and colon cancer models.
-
Breast Cancer Modeling
Breast cancer is a heterogeneous cancer, and it has been distinguished into four subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, HER2-positive and basal-like. Molecular mutations, epigenetic alterations, hormone exposure and immune microenvironment are related to the progression of breast cancer.
-
Orthotopic Cell-Line Xenograft
Orthotopic cell-line xenograft models involve implantation of human cancer cell lines into the anatomically corresponding organ of immunodeficient mice to reproduce tumor growth within a native microenvironment, enabling more clinically relevant tumor behavior compared with subcutaneous models. These models are widely used because orthotopic placement better recapitulates tumor progression, including invasion and metastatic spread, which are often underrepresented in heterotopic implantation systems. Compared with conventional xenografts, orthotopic implantation is described as more technically complex but provides improved simulation of tumor-microenvironment interactions and metastatic behavior, making it particularly valuable for translational oncology research. Surgical orthotopic implantation approaches have been emphasized as enabling faithful reproduction of clinical cancer features, including metastasis and disease progression patterns that align with the tumor’s organ of origi
-
Acute Systemic Toxicity Study
Acute systemic toxicity studies evaluate adverse effects occurring after a single exposure, or repeated exposure within a short acute window, and the main in vivo readouts are mortality, moribund condition, clinical signs, body-weight change, and gross pathological findings; acute oral toxicity methods were developed to replace classical LD50 testing with reduced-animal designs such as fixed-dose procedure, acute toxic class method, and up-and-down procedure. The fixed-dose procedure classifies acute toxicity by administering predefined dose levels and observing evident toxicity rather than using death as the primary endpoint, whereas the acute toxic class method uses sequential groups of three animals per step and the up-and-down procedure doses animals sequentially to estimate an LD50 with fewer animals than conventional LD50 testing.
Purity & Documentation
References
Calculators
Concentration (start) × Volume (start) = Concentration (final) × Volume (final)