T/NK/CAR-T Cell Therapy Product Thawing
Materials Required
Principle
Thawing of cryopreserved T, NK, and CAR-T cell therapy products aims to return cells from cryogenic storage to liquid suspension while minimizing freeze-thaw injury, osmotic stress, DMSO exposure, and post-thaw functional loss; reported readouts include viable cell recovery, membrane-integrity viability, phenotype/CAR expression, cytokine release, degranulation, cytotoxicity, and sterility/endotoxin testing where applicable[1][2][3][4][5][6]. Cryopreserved CAR-T products are commonly thawed rapidly at 37°C in published studies, and one validated CAR-T thaw/wash method used 37°C thawing followed by stepwise dilution, centrifugation-based washing, final resuspension, and stability assessment over 3 h at 20-25°C[4][7][8].
MCE has not independently verified the accuracy of these methods. They are for reference only.
Experimental Materials
• Use viability dyes or counting methods suitable for membrane-integrity viability, and use flow-cytometry reagents for CD3, CD4/CD8 or NK markers, CAR/transgene surface expression, CD107a degranulation, or intracellular effector molecules only when those endpoints are part of the study design[3][4][6][7][8].
• Use a temperature-controlled 37°C water bath or validated thawing system, sterile transfer vessels, centrifuge, biosafety cabinet or equivalent aseptic processing environment, cell counter or flow cytometer, and cytotoxicity-assay platform when functional release testing is required[2][4][6][7][8].
Experimental Procedure
• Prepare all diluent before removing the product from cryogenic storage; the Akel CAR-T thaw/wash method used 1 volume preservative-free normal saline for 5 min equilibration, then an additional 8 volumes preservative-free normal saline before washing and resuspension in 2.0 mL preservative-free normal saline[4].
• Remove the cryopreserved cell container from cryogenic storage and thaw at 37°C; published T-cell and CAR-T studies report 37°C water-bath thawing, with some protocols thawing until a small ice crystal remains or until the suspension is just melted[2][4][7][8].
• For a no-wash experimental workflow, transfer the thawed cell suspension promptly into the selected pre-warmed medium or assay buffer, mix gently, and proceed to cell counting, viability assessment, phenotype testing, functional assay, culture, or administration-related handling according to the study endpoint[1][3][7][8].
• For the literature-supported CAR-T thaw/wash workflow, thaw at 37°C, add 1 product volume of preservative-free normal saline and equilibrate for 5 min, dilute with an additional 8 volumes preservative-free normal saline, remove DMSO by washing, resuspend the final product in 2.0 mL preservative-free normal saline, and hold in a syringe at 20-25°C only within the 3 h stability window validated in that study[4].
• If centrifugation is used for experimental T-cell thaw recovery, one published T-cell/CAR-T recovery workflow diluted thawed cells into 9-10 mL medium and centrifuged for 5 min; reported centrifugal conditions varied by study and should therefore be copied only from the selected source protocol rather than generalized[7][8].
• Measure immediate post-thaw viable cell recovery and viability, and when the product is CAR-T or NK, include identity/phenotype and function-oriented readouts such as CAR expression, CD4/CD8 composition, CD107a degranulation, cytokine production, or tumor-cell killing, because cryopreservation can preserve some functions while reducing others depending on cell type and assay[3][4][5][6][7][8].
• Use fresh or non-cryopreserved cells as the comparator when the experimental question is freeze-thaw impact, use thawed-not-washed cells as the comparator when the question is DMSO-removal impact, and include the functional target-cell assay controls needed for cytotoxicity interpretation[3][4][5][6][7][8].
Troubleshooting
Low viable recovery after thawing:
Possible causeFreeze-thaw injury and delayed post-thaw cell death can reduce viable recovery, and T-cell studies show that cooling/thawing history and post-thaw culture time affect measured recovery.
Literature-supported solution:
Standardize the thawing temperature, thaw endpoint, dilution/wash timing, and recovery-assay time point, and report immediate and delayed post-thaw viability rather than relying on one time point[2][7][9].
Reduced CAR-T functional readout after thawing:
Possible causeCryopreservation has been associated with altered apoptotic markers and reduced cytokine secretion in some CAR-T studies, although cytotoxic function may remain detectable.
Literature-supported solution:
Pair viability testing with CAR expression and functional assays such as cytotoxicity, cytokine release, or degranulation before interpreting thaw success[3][7][8].
NK cells show reduced cytotoxicity despite acceptable viability:
Possible causeNK-cell cryopreservation can impair migration and cytotoxicity in three-dimensional assays even when degranulation is retained.
Literature-supported solution:
Include a direct cytotoxicity assay, and where relevant a migration or 3D-function assay, rather than using viability alone as the release or comparison endpoint[5][6].
DMSO removal is required for a specific experimental or delivery route:
Possible causeDMSO remains in conventional cryopreserved products after thaw unless dilution/washing is performed.
Literature-supported solution:
Use the published CAR-T thaw/wash sequence of 37°C thaw, 1-volume saline equilibration for 5 min, 8-volume dilution, wash, 2.0 mL saline resuspension, and 20-25°C storage for up to 3 h only for a comparable CAR-T context[4].
References:
- [1]. Li R, et al. Preservation of cell-based immunotherapies for clinical trials. Cytotherapy. 2019;21(9):943-957. [Content Brief]
- [2]. Baboo J, Kilbride P, Delahaye M, Milne S, Fonseca F, Blanco M, et al. The impact of varying cooling and thawing rates on the quality of cryopreserved human peripheral blood T cells. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):3417. [Content Brief]
- [3]. Panch SR, Srivastava SK, Elavia N, McManus A, Liu S, Jin P, et al. Effect of cryopreservation on autologous chimeric antigen receptor T cell characteristics. Mol Ther. 2019;27(7):1275-1285. [Content Brief]
- [4]. Akel S, Karol SE, Inaba H, Bragg A, Zheng W, Zhou SM, et al. Preparation of cryopreserved chimeric antigen receptor T cells for the locoregional delivery to the neural axis. Cytotherapy. 2024;26(3):268-275. [Content Brief]
- [5]. Mark C, Czerwinski T, Roessner S, Mainka A, Hörsch F, Heublein L, et al. Cryopreservation impairs 3-D migration and cytotoxicity of natural killer cells. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):5224. [Content Brief]
- [6]. Lee S, Joo Y, Lee EJ, Byeon Y, Kim JH, Pyo KH, et al. Successful expansion and cryopreservation of human natural killer cell line NK-92 for clinical manufacturing. PLoS One. 2024;19(2):e0294857. [Content Brief]
- [7]. Xu H, Cao W, Huang L, Xiao M, Cao Y, Zhao L, et al. Effects of cryopreservation on chimeric antigen receptor T cell functions. Cryobiology. 2018;83:40-47. [Content Brief]
- [8]. Brezinger-Dayan K, Itzhaki O, Melnichenko J, Kubi A, Zeltzer LA, Jacoby E, et al. Impact of cryopreservation on CAR T production and clinical response. Front Oncol. 2022;12:1024362. [Content Brief]
- [9]. Pi CH, et al. Understanding the freezing responses of T cells and other subsets of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells using DMSO-free cryoprotectants. Cytotherapy. 2020;22(5):291-300. [Content Brief]