Transwell/Boyden Chamber Migration Assay
Materials Required
Principle
The Transwell/Boyden chamber migration assay measures cell movement through a porous membrane separating an upper and lower chamber, usually after a chemoattractant gradient is established by placing cells in the upper chamber and chemoattractant-containing medium in the lower chamber[1][2][3]. The readout is generated by quantifying cells that traverse the membrane and appear on the lower membrane surface or in the lower chamber, depending on whether the cell type is adherent or non-adherent[1][2]. This assay reflects chemotactic or haptotactic migration rather than matrix invasion unless an extracellular-matrix barrier is added to the membrane[1][2][3].
MCE has not independently verified the accuracy of these methods. They are for reference only.
Experimental Materials
• For a commonly reported 24-well format, published protocols used 600 μL chemoattractant medium in the lower chamber and 100 μL cell suspension in the insert[2].
• Crystal violet has been used to stain fixed migrated cells for microscopic counting, Hoechst at 10 μg/mL has been used for nuclear fluorescence imaging of total and migrated cells, DAPI staining has been used to improve counting of cells on transparent membranes, and D-luciferin has been used when luciferase-expressing cells are quantified by bioluminescence[1][3][4][5].
• Use Transwell inserts containing porous membranes, a compatible multiwell plate, sterile pipettes, a CO2 incubator, cotton-tipped applicators for removing non-migrated cells, an inverted microscope or fluorescence microscope for imaging/counting, and image-analysis software such as ImageJ/Fiji when image-based quantification is performed[1][2][3][4].
• For bioluminescence-based migration assays, a low-light imaging system such as IVIS was used to image migrated luciferase-expressing cells after D-luciferin addition[5].
Experimental Procedure
• Prepare a single-cell suspension in serum-free medium or the defined experimental medium, and prepare the lower-chamber medium containing the chemoattractant; 10% FBS has been used as a chemoattractant in melanoma and breast-cancer Transwell migration examples[1][3].
• For a 24-well Transwell format, seed cells into the upper insert and add chemoattractant medium to the lower well without introducing bubbles or disrupting membrane contact; one protocol placed 100 μL cell suspension into the insert and 600 μL chemoattractant into the lower chamber[2].
• Incubation time should be optimized for the cell type and chemoattractant; published examples include 20 h for melanoma cells, 20 h for breast cancer cell migration, and 24 h for luciferase-expressing tumor-cell migration assays[1][3][5].
• Place the Transwell insert into the plate, add cell suspension to the upper side of the membrane, add chemoattractant-containing medium to the lower chamber, and incubate under standard cell-culture conditions for the literature-supported time window selected for the cell model[1][2][3][5].
• After incubation, remove medium and non-migrated cells from the upper membrane surface using a cotton-tipped applicator, taking care not to damage the membrane[2][5].
• For crystal violet endpoint analysis, fix migrated adherent cells by placing the insert in 70% ethanol for 10 min, allow the membrane to dry for approximately 10-15 min, stain with 0.2% crystal violet at room temperature for 5-10 min, rinse gently with distilled water until excess stain is removed, dry the membrane, and count migrated cells under an inverted microscope[2].
• For fluorescence endpoint analysis, stain nuclei with Hoechst or DAPI and image cells on transparent membranes; DAPI staining plus bright-field overlay can improve discrimination of cells and membrane pores during counting[1][4].
• For bioluminescence endpoint analysis, remove non-migrated cells, wash the insert with PBS, remove residual moisture from the upper side, invert the insert with the migrated-cell surface facing upward, add 40 μL D-luciferin solution onto the membrane surface, immediately image with a low-light imaging system, and convert signal to cell number using a standard curve when absolute migrated-cell numbers are required[5].
• For microscopic analysis, quantify migrated cells by counting multiple representative fields or by whole-membrane image analysis when available; Pijuan et al. counted 10 random microscope fields per sample across 3 independent experiments, whereas Yoon et al. reported that whole-surface bioluminescence avoids error from uneven migration across selected fields[1][5].
• Report results as migrated cell number, percentage migration, relative fluorescence/absorbance/luminescence, or treatment-normalized migration, but use the same readout across all conditions within one experiment[1][3][5].
• Include a negative control lacking chemoattractant or using basal medium, and include a chemoattractant-positive condition when testing inhibitors or treatments; examples include serum-free medium versus 10% FBS as lower-chamber conditions[1][3].
• Published studies used independent biological experiments and replicate wells or fields, including 3 independent experiments in a fluorescence-counting protocol and n = 5 Transwells in a bioluminescence co-incubation experiment[1][5].
Troubleshooting
Problem: Migrated cells are too dense or unevenly distributed for reliable manual counting.
• Possible Cause: Cell seeding density or incubation time produced excessive membrane coverage, and representative-field counting may not capture uneven migration.• Literature-supported Solution: Reduce the seeding density or incubation duration for the cell model, or use whole-membrane quantification such as bioluminescence when luciferase-expressing cells are available[5].
Problem: Cells remaining on the upper membrane surface distort migration percentage.
• Possible Cause: Non-migrated cells were not quantified or removed consistently before endpoint analysis.• Literature-supported Solution: Remove non-migrated cells with cotton swabs before imaging migrated cells, and consider counting cells on top of the membrane when calculating percentage migration[2][4].
Problem: Cell counting is difficult on opaque or pore-rich membranes.
• Possible Cause: Membrane pores and stained nuclei may be hard to distinguish.• Literature-supported Solution: Use transparent inserts with DAPI-stained cells and overlay bright-field pore images with fluorescence images to improve counting accuracy[4].
Problem: Crystal violet quantification cannot distinguish two co-cultured cell types.
• Possible Cause: Crystal violet stains all adherent migrated cells.• Literature-supported Solution: Use luciferase-labeled target cells and bioluminescence-based quantification when the experimental question requires measuring migration of one cell type in the presence of non-labeled stromal cells[5].
References:
- [1]. Pijuan J, et al. In vitro cell migration, invasion, and adhesion assays: from cell imaging to data analysis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019;7:107. [Content Brief]
- [2]. Justus CR, et al. In vitro cell migration and invasion assays. J Vis Exp. 2014;(88):51046. [Content Brief]
- [3]. Justus CR, et al. Transwell in vitro cell migration and invasion assays. Methods Mol Biol. 2023;2644:349-359. [Content Brief]
- [4]. Stoellinger HM, et al. Modifications to the Transwell migration/invasion assay method that eases assay performance and improves the accuracy. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2022;20(2):64-74. [Content Brief]
- [5]. Yoon J, et al. A rapid and accurate bioluminescence-based migration assay permitting analysis of tumor cell/stromal cell interactions. Methods Protoc. 2020;3(1):10. [Content Brief]