Matrigel Transwell/Boyden Chamber Invasion Assay
Materials Required
Principle
Matrigel Transwell/Boyden chamber invasion assay measures the ability of cells to degrade or traverse an extracellular matrix-coated porous membrane and move from an upper chamber toward a chemoattractant in a lower chamber[1][2]. Invasion is distinguished from migration by coating the membrane with Matrigel or basement membrane matrix; uncoated inserts measure migration, while coated inserts require cells to cross an ECM barrier before reaching the underside of the membrane[1][2][3].
MCE has not independently verified the accuracy of these methods. They are for reference only.
Experimental Materials
Reagents and chemicals
• Matrigel or basement membrane matrix is used as the ECM barrier on the porous insert membrane[1][2][4].• Serum-containing medium or another defined chemoattractant is placed in the lower chamber to generate a directional migration cue[1][2].
• PBS is used for washing, and paraformaldehyde can be used for fixation before staining and image acquisition[2].
Antibodies, probes, dyes, or kits
• Hoechst staining, crystal violet, or hematoxylin can be used to visualize invaded cells after fixation[2][5].• Matrigel composition can influence interpretation because regular and growth-factor-reduced Matrigel contain different matrix-associated proteins, proteases, inhibitors, and growth-factor content[4].
Equipment and instruments
• The assay uses a Transwell or Boyden chamber insert with a porous membrane separating upper and lower medium compartments[1][3].• A fluorescence or brightfield microscope is used to image invaded cells, and ImageJ/Fiji or absorbance-based plate-reader workflows can be used for quantification depending on the staining method[2][5][6].
Experimental Procedure
Preparation Steps
• Prepare healthy cells in the appropriate growth medium before assay setup, because cell viability and baseline motility influence invasion readout[2][3].• For Matrigel coating, one published protocol thawed Matrigel at 4°C overnight, diluted Matrigel 1:3 in cold serum-free DMEM, coated the underside of the insert membrane with 25 µL Matrigel solution, and gelled the coating at 37°C for 30 min[2].
• The same protocol used 8 µm pore membranes as an example, but pore size should be selected according to cell size[2].
Operation Steps
• Place culture medium with or without chemoattractant in the lower chamber; one published protocol used 500 µL medium in the lower well of a 24-well plate and 10% FBS as the melanoma-cell chemoattractant condition[2].• Transfer the coated insert into the lower well, add the cell suspension to the upper chamber, and incubate at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 20–24 h in the reported protocol[2].
• After incubation, fix cells with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature, wash both membrane sides twice with PBS, stain nuclei with Hoechst at 10 µg/mL for 15 min or use crystal violet or hematoxylin, then remove non-invaded cells from the upper membrane surface with gentle cotton-swab scraping before final imaging[2].
Data Acquisition and Analysis
• Acquire images covering the membrane surface before and after removal of non-invaded cells when calculating the percentage of invaded cells, or count stained cells on the underside of the membrane as the endpoint readout[2][3].• Quantification may be performed by manual counting, ImageJ/Fiji-based analysis, imaging cytometry, dye extraction followed by absorbance measurement, or impedance-based real-time readout, but the same readout should be applied consistently within an experiment[2][5][6].
• Include uncoated migration inserts, no-chemoattractant controls, vehicle controls, positive invasive-cell controls, and cell-viability controls when testing drugs or genetic perturbations, because reduced invasion can reflect either impaired invasion or reduced survival/proliferation[3][6].
Troubleshooting
Problem: Matrigel coating is inconsistent or absent after setup.
• Possible Cause: Matrigel gels rapidly at room temperature and remains liquid at 4°C.• Literature-supported Solution: Thaw Matrigel at 4°C overnight, keep materials cold during dilution and coating, and gel the coated insert at 37°C for at least 30 min[2].
Problem: Invaded-cell counts are inaccurate.
• Possible Cause: Non-invaded cells remaining on the upper membrane surface can be counted as invaded cells.• Literature-supported Solution: Remove upper-surface cells gently with a cotton swab before final imaging and quantify only cells remaining on the invaded side of the membrane[2][3].
Problem: Apparent invasion differs between Matrigel lots or matrix types.
• Possible Cause: Matrigel and growth-factor-reduced Matrigel contain different bioactive components, including matrix enzymes, protease inhibitors, and growth factors.• Literature-supported Solution: Record the Matrigel type, keep matrix type consistent within experiments, and interpret invasion changes in light of matrix composition[4].
References:
- [1]. Albini A, et al. The “chemoinvasion assay”: a tool to study tumor and endothelial cell invasion of basement membranes. Int J Dev Biol. 2004;48(5-6):563-571. [Content Brief]
- [2]. Pijuan J, et al. In vitro cell migration, invasion, and adhesion assays: from cell imaging to data analysis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019;7:107. [Content Brief]
- [3]. Hulkower KI, et al. Cell migration and invasion assays as tools for drug discovery. Pharmaceutics. 2011;3(1):107-124. [Content Brief]
- [4]. Gillette KM, et al. Detection of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2, urokinase and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 within Matrigel and growth factor-reduced Matrigel basement membrane. Tumori. 2003;89(4):421-425. [Content Brief]
- [5]. Brown KC, et al. An experimental protocol for the Boyden chamber invasion assay with absorbance readout. Bio Protoc. 2024;14(15):e5040. [Content Brief]
- [6]. Limame R, et al. Comparative analysis of dynamic cell viability, migration and invasion assessments by novel real-time technology and classic endpoint assays. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46536. [Content Brief]