Distinct but overlapping binding sites of agonist and antagonist at the relaxin family peptide 3 (RXFP3) receptor

  • J Biol Chem. 2018 Oct 12;293(41):15777-15789. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.002645.
Lilian L L Wong  1 Daniel James Scott  1  2 Mohammed Akhter Hossain  1  3 Quentin Kaas  4 K Johan Rosengren  5 Ross A D Bathgate  6  2
Affiliations
  • 1. From the Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health.
  • 2. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, and.
  • 3. School of Chemistry, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia and.
  • 4. the Institute for Molecular Bioscience and.
  • 5. Faculty of Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia [email protected].
  • 6. From the Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, [email protected].
Abstract

The relaxin-3 neuropeptide activates the relaxin family peptide 3 (RXFP3) receptor to modulate stress, appetite, and cognition. RXFP3 shows promise as a target for treating neurological disorders, but realization of its clinical potential requires development of smaller RXFP3-specific drugs that can penetrate the blood-brain barrier. Designing such drugs is challenging and requires structural knowledge of agonist- and antagonist-binding modes. Here, we used structure-activity data for relaxin-3 and a peptide RXFP3 antagonist termed R3 B1-22R to guide receptor mutagenesis and develop models of their binding modes. RXFP3 residues were alanine-substituted individually and in combination and tested in cell-based binding and functional assays to refine models of agonist and antagonist binding to active- and inactive-state homology models of RXFP3, respectively. These models suggested that both agonists and antagonists interact with RXFP3 via similar residues in their B-chain central helix. The models further suggested that the B-chain Trp27 inserts into the binding pocket of RXFP3 and interacts with Trp138 and Lys271, the latter through a salt bridge with the C-terminal carboxyl group of Trp27 in relaxin-3. R3 B1-22R, which does not contain Trp27, used a non-native Arg23 residue to form cation-π and salt-bridge interactions with Trp138 and Glu141 in RXFP3, explaining a key contribution of Arg23 to affinity. Overall, relaxin-3 and R3 B1-22R appear to share similar binding residues but may differ in binding modes, leading to active and inactive RXFP3 conformational states, respectively. These mechanistic insights may assist structure-based drug design of smaller relaxin-3 mimetics to manage neurological disorders.

Keywords
G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR); RXFP3; molecular docking; molecular modeling; relaxin; relaxin-3; site-directed mutagenesis.