PROTAC HDAC6 degrader 10
PROTAC HDAC6 degrader 10 is a highly efficient, safe and selective HDAC6 PROTAC degrader with a pIC50 of 8.75 and a pDC50 of 9.2 in BEAS-2B cells. PROTAC HDAC6 degrader 10 recruits cereblon to form a ternary complex with HDAC6, thereby achieving the degradation of HDAC6. PROTAC HDAC6 degrader 10 significantly induces hyperacetylation of α-tubulin without affecting the acetylation of H3, and achieves sustained HDAC6 knockdown in mouse lung tissues. PROTAC HDAC6 degrader 10 exhibits high bioavailability after subcutaneous administration in mice. PROTAC HDAC6 degrader 10 enables the study of HDAC6 pharmacology via chemical knockdown of HDAC6 in vitro and in vivo, and can be used for research on pulmonary diseases.
(Pink: HDAC6 ligand (HY-184430); Blue: Cereblon ligand (HY-133144); Black: linker).
Nos produits utilisent uniquement pour la recherche. Nous ne vendons pas aux patients.
- Formule: C37H34N4O8
- Masse moléculaire:662.69
-
Stockage:
Please store the product under the recommended conditions in the Certificate of Analysis.
Voir tous les produits spécifiques à Isoform PROTACs
More
Activité biologique
Description
IC50 & Target
[1]|
hHDAC6 9.2 (pIC50) |
In Vitro
PROTAC HDAC6 degrader 10 (compound 15) potently inhibits human HDAC6 enzymatic activity in a cell-free assay with a pIC50 of 8.75[1].
PROTAC HDAC6 degrader 10 induces complete, cereblon-dependent HDAC6 degradation in BEAS-2B cells with a subnanomolar pDC50 of 9.10[1].
PROTAC HDAC6 degrader 10 potently induces α-tubulin hyperacetylation in BEAS-2B cells with a pIC50 of 7.61[1].
PROTAC HDAC6 degrader 10 does not induce histone H3 hyperacetylation in BEAS-2B cells, demonstrating selective HDAC6 activity over class I HDAC isoforms[1].
PROTAC HDAC6 degrader 10 shows low cytotoxicity in THP1 cells, consistent with selective HDAC6 activity[1].
PROTAC HDAC6 degrader 10 has a favorable in vitro secondary pharmacology profile with limited off-target activity and no genotoxicity in micronucleus testing[1].
MedChemExpress (MCE) has not independently confirmed the accuracy of these methods. They are for reference only. Further protocols information, click here.
Parmacokinetics
In Vivo
PROTAC HDAC6 degrader 10 (50 mg/kg; subcutaneous injection; single administration) induces 75% degradation of HDAC6 in mouse lung tissues at 96 h after a single dose[1].
PROTAC HDAC6 degrader 10 (50 mg/kg; subcutaneous injection; once daily) achieves an 86% degradation rate after four consecutive days of administration, accompanied by significant hyperacetylation of α-tubulin[1].
MedChemExpress (MCE) has not independently confirmed the accuracy of these methods. They are for reference only.
-
Animal Model:C57/Bl (female)[1]
-
Dosage:2 mg/kg; 10 mg/kg; 50 mg/kg
-
Administration:s.c.; single dose
-
Result:Caused significant, dose-dependent degradation of lung HDAC6 relative to vehicle control.
Caused significant, dose-dependent increases in lung acetylated α-tubulin levels relative to vehicle control .
-
Animal Model:C57/Bl (female); HDAC6 knockout[1]
-
Dosage:50 mg/kg
-
Administration:s.c.; single dose
-
Result:Achieved 75% HDAC6 degradation in lung tissue 96 hours post single dose.
-
Animal Model:C57/Bl (female); HDAC6 knockout[1]
-
Dosage:50 mg/kg
-
Administration:s.c.; daily; 4 days
-
Result:Achieved 86% HDAC6 degradation in lung tissue 24 hours after the final of four daily doses.
Induced robust α-tubulin hyperacetylation in lung tissue after repeated dosing, similar to levels in HDAC6 knockout mice .
Chemical Information
-
Masse moléculaire 662.69
-
Formule C37H34N4O8
-
SMILES
O=C(C1=CC=C2CN(C(C3CCOCC3)=O)[C@@H](C4=CC=C(C#CC5=CC6=C(C(N(C(CC7)C(NC7=O)=O)C6)=O)C=C5)C=C4)COC2=C1)NO
-
Livraison
Room temperature in continental US; may vary elsewhere.
-
Stockage
Please store the product under the recommended conditions in the Certificate of Analysis.
Protocole
-
How to Select the Route of Administration for Mammals
Route-of-administration selection in mammals is a pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, formulation, animal-welfare, and translational decision, not a default technical choice. The selected route should match the study goal: intravenous dosing is most useful when complete systemic exposure and rapid onset are required, oral dosing is most translational for orally intended medicines but is affected by absorption and first-pass metabolism, subcutaneous or intramuscular dosing can provide slower systemic exposure, and intraperitoneal dosing can be useful in rodent proof-of-concept studies but may have limited clinical translation. Published route-comparison studies show that the same compound can produce different exposure, onset, bioavailability, tissue distribution, and tolerability depending on route; therefore, route choice should be supported by pilot pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic evidence when the literature is insufficient. Unresolved questions include how to standardize route sel
-
Protocol for Pharmacokinetic Study
Pharmacokinetic studies quantify how an organism handles a drug over time through absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion, and the core experimental readout is the concentration-time profile of parent drug and, when relevant, metabolites in biological matrices such as plasma, whole blood, urine, bile, or tissue. Pharmacokinetic analysis links dose, route, exposure, clearance, half-life, distribution, bioavailability, and systemic exposure to drug efficacy and toxicity hypotheses rather than measuring a signaling pathway directly. The literature links pharmacokinetics to drug-development phenotypes by showing that drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics influence compound progression, exposure-response interpretation, safety margins, dosing strategy, and failure risk during discovery and development. DMPK science contributes to compound optimization by integrating physicochemical properties, in vitro metabolism, transporter behavior, in vivo exposure, and pharmacodynamic contex
-
RNA interference technology
RNA interference (RNAi) is a cellular mechanism that inhibits gene expression by suppressing gene transcription or activating RNA degradation. This mechanism was discovered in plants in 1998 by Andrew Fire and Craig Mello. Today, this phenomenon can be observed in almost all eukaryotes, including protozoa, flies, nematodes, insects, parasites, and mammals.
Pureté et documentation
Références
Calculators
Concentration (start) × Volume (start) = Concentration (final) × Volume (final)