Interphase phosphorylation of lamin A
- J Cell Sci. 2014 Jun 15;127(Pt 12):2683-96. doi: 10.1242/jcs.141820.
- 1. Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, FIN-20521 Turku, Finland Department of Biosciences, Åbo Akademi University, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland Department of Pathology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8556, Japan.
- 2. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
- 3. Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, FIN-20521 Turku, Finland Department of Biosciences, Åbo Akademi University, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland.
- 4. Cellular Informatics Laboratory, RIKEN, Wako-shi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.
- 5. Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, FIN-20521 Turku, Finland.
- 6. Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, FIN-20521 Turku, Finland Department of Biosciences, Åbo Akademi University, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland [email protected].
Nuclear lamins form the major structural elements that comprise the nuclear lamina. Loss of nuclear structural integrity has been implicated as a key factor in the lamin A/C gene mutations that cause laminopathies, whereas the normal regulation of lamin A assembly and organization in interphase cells is still undefined. We assumed phosphorylation to be a major determinant, identifying 20 prime interphase phosphorylation sites, of which eight were high-turnover sites. We examined the roles of these latter sites by site-directed mutagenesis, followed by detailed microscopic analysis - including fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and nuclear extraction techniques. The results reveal three phosphorylation regions, each with dominant sites, together controlling lamin A structure and dynamics. Interestingly, two of these interphase sites are hyper-phosphorylated in mitotic cells and one of these sites is within the sequence that is missing in progerin of the Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. We present a model where different phosphorylation combinations yield markedly different effects on the assembly, subunit turnover and the mobility of lamin A between, and within, the lamina, the nucleoplasm and the cytoplasm of interphase cells.