Protocol for Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA)
Materials Required
Principle
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay detects protein-nucleic acid binding by incubating a labeled DNA or RNA probe with purified protein or cell extract, then separating free probe from slower-migrating protein-probe complexes on a native gel[1][2].
For cancer cells, primary neurons, mouse tumor samples, intestinal organoids, inflammatory macrophages, or drug-treated samples, EMSA can measure transcription-factor DNA binding or RNA-binding protein activity in extracts, but it does not directly measure transcription, protein expression, or chromatin occupancy in intact cells[2][3].
Specificity is judged by competition with unlabeled wild-type probe, failure of mutated or unrelated competitors to compete, and antibody supershift or disruption when the binding protein identity must be confirmed[3][4].
MCE has not independently verified the accuracy of these methods. They are for reference only.
Experimental Materials
Reagents and chemicals
• Use nuclear extract, whole-cell extract, or purified recombinant protein as the protein source; nuclear extracts are commonly used for transcription-factor EMSA because many active DNA-binding proteins are nuclear[2][5].• Use a double-stranded DNA oligonucleotide probe containing the candidate binding site, or an RNA probe when testing RNA-protein binding; label the probe with ^32P, fluorescent dye, DIG, or biotin only when the detection method is validated for the assay[1][2][6][7].
• Use nonspecific competitor DNA such as poly(dI-dC) to reduce nonspecific DNA binding in crude extracts, and use unlabeled wild-type, mutant, or unrelated competitor oligonucleotides to test sequence specificity[3][5].
Antibodies, probes, dyes, or kits
• Use antibodies against the candidate DNA-binding protein for supershift EMSA, where antibody binding causes further retardation or loss of the shifted complex[2][3][4].• Use fluorescently labeled probes and infrared or fluorescence scanners as a nonradioactive alternative to radiolabeled EMSA when sensitivity and signal range are validated[6][7].
Cells, tissues, isolated organs, organoids, or animals
• Use cancer cells, primary neurons, tumor tissue, organoid-derived cells, or macrophages only as sources of protein extract for EMSA; matched untreated, stimulated, vehicle-treated, or drug-treated samples should be prepared in parallel when comparing signaling or drug effects[2][5].Buffers and solutions
• Prepare extract buffer, binding buffer, native gel buffer, loading buffer without denaturants, and electrophoresis buffer; maintain native conditions because protein-nucleic acid complex stability and mobility depend on buffer composition, salt, temperature, and gel conditions[1][2].Equipment and instruments
• Use refrigerated centrifuge, gel casting equipment, native polyacrylamide electrophoresis apparatus, power supply, gel dryer for radioactive EMSA, phosphorimager or autoradiography system, or fluorescence/chemiluminescence imaging system depending on probe label[1][2][6].Controls
• Include free probe alone, extract alone when compatible with the detection format, positive-control extract or protein, no-protein control, unlabeled wild-type competitor, mutant competitor, unrelated competitor, and antibody supershift control[2][3][4].Experimental Procedure
Preparation Steps
• Prepare protein extracts from the selected biological model under conditions that preserve DNA- or RNA-binding activity, quantify protein concentration, and keep extraction conditions consistent across experimental groups[2][5].• Design a probe containing the candidate binding site and a matched mutant probe or mutant competitor; for allele-specific or variant-specific EMSA, compare risk and non-risk or wild-type and mutant oligonucleotides under the same binding conditions[3][8].
• Cast or prepare a native polyacrylamide gel appropriate for separating free probe from protein-probe complexes; EMSA is performed under non-denaturing conditions because denaturing gels disrupt protein-nucleic acid complexes[1][2].
Operation Steps
• Preincubate protein extract with binding buffer and nonspecific competitor DNA before adding labeled probe when using crude nuclear extract, because omission of preincubation with competitor DNA can produce nonspecific Ku-dependent bands[5].• Add labeled probe to the binding reaction and incubate under validated conditions that preserve the complex; exact protein amount, probe amount, time, temperature, salt, and competitor concentration should be optimized and reported because EMSA complex stability is system-dependent[1][2].
• For competition EMSA, add excess unlabeled wild-type competitor, mutant competitor, or unrelated competitor before or during binding; loss of shifted signal with wild-type but not mutant or unrelated competitor supports sequence-specific binding[3][4].
• For supershift EMSA, add a specific antibody against the candidate protein to the binding reaction and compare mobility with no-antibody and irrelevant-antibody controls; a slower supershifted complex or disappearance of the original complex supports protein identity[2][3][4].
• Load reactions onto a native gel and electrophorese under non-denaturing conditions until free probe and shifted complexes are resolved[1][2].
• Detect the labeled probe by autoradiography, phosphorimaging, fluorescence scanning, DIG-based detection, or biotin-based chemiluminescence according to the probe label[2][6][7][9].
Data Acquisition and Analysis
• Acquire images within the linear range of detection and quantify free probe, shifted complex, supershifted complex, and competition-dependent signal reduction by densitometry or phosphorimager/fluorescence signal analysis[1][2].• Normalize shifted-band intensity to total probe signal per lane or to a matched positive-control lane, and compare only samples run under identical binding, gel, and exposure conditions[1][2].
• Interpret increased shifted signal as increased binding activity in the extract, not necessarily increased protein abundance; confirm abundance by Western blot, localization by immunofluorescence, transcript effects by qPCR, and chromatin occupancy by ChIP-based assays when biological interpretation requires these endpoints[2][3].
• Use independent biological extracts for comparisons across cancer cells, neurons, tumor samples, organoids, macrophages, or drug treatments, and use technical replicate binding reactions when estimating assay variability[2][8].
Troubleshooting
Problem: Strong nonspecific shifted bands.
Possible Cause: nonspecific DNA-binding proteins such as Ku bind probe ends in crude nuclear extract.Literature-supported Solution: preincubate extract with nonspecific competitor DNA before adding labeled probe and verify specificity with wild-type, mutant, and unrelated competitors[5].
Problem: Shifted band does not disappear with mutant competitor.
Possible Cause: the complex is not sequence-specific for the proposed motif.Literature-supported Solution: use wild-type, mutated, and unrelated competitor oligonucleotides; only wild-type sequence-specific competitor should reduce a specific complex[3][4].
Problem: Protein identity is uncertain.
Possible Cause: multiple proteins or multiprotein complexes bind the same probe.Literature-supported Solution: perform antibody supershift or EMSA coupled to immunoblotting/proteomic identification when antibody supershift is insufficient[3][4][10].
Problem: Weak signal with nonradioactive EMSA.
Possible Cause: probe label or detection method lacks sufficient sensitivity for the complex.Literature-supported Solution: use optimized fluorescent, DIG, biotin, or radiolabeled probe detection and validate signal sensitivity against a positive-control binding reaction[2][6][7][9].
Problem: Drug-treated samples show reduced binding.
Possible Cause: true inhibition of binding, reduced protein abundance, extract toxicity, or poor nuclear extraction.Literature-supported Solution: compare with vehicle control and confirm protein abundance or nuclear localization using orthogonal assays such as Western blot or immunofluorescence[2][3].
Références:
- [1]. Hellman LM, et al. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) for detecting protein-nucleic acid interactions. Nat Protoc. 2007;2(8):1849-1861. [Content Brief]
- [2]. Holden NS, et al. Principles and problems of the electrophoretic mobility shift assay. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2011;63(1):7-14. [Content Brief]
- [3]. Javed A, et al. Protein-deoxyribonucleic acid interactions linked to gene expression: electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2004;285:45-55. [Content Brief]
- [4]. Arnett KL, et al. Analyzing the nuclear complexes of Notch signaling by electrophoretic mobility shift assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1187:231-245. [Content Brief]
- [5]. Klug J. Ku autoantigen is a potential major cause of nonspecific bands in electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Biotechniques. 1997;22(2):212-214,216. [Content Brief]
- [6]. Murphy K, et al. Use of fluorescently labeled DNA and a scanner for electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Biotechniques. 2001;30(3):504-506,508. [Content Brief]
- [7]. Hsieh YW, et al. An optimized protocol for electrophoretic mobility shift assay using infrared fluorescent dye-labeled oligonucleotides. J Vis Exp. 2016;(117):54863. [Content Brief]
- [8]. Miller DE, et al. Screening for functional non-coding genetic variants using electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and DNA-affinity precipitation assay (DAPA). J Vis Exp. 2016;(114):54093. [Content Brief]
- [9]. Wang F, et al. Protocol to detect nucleotide-protein interaction in vitro using a non-radioactive competitive electrophoretic mobility shift assay. STAR Protoc. 2022;3(4):101730.
- [10]. Osborn MT, et al. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay coupled with immunoblotting for the identification of DNA-binding proteins. Biotechniques. 1999;27(5):887-890,892. [Content Brief]