A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Prasinezumab in Early Parkinson's Disease (PASADENA): Rationale, Design, and Baseline Data

  • Front Neurol. 2021 Oct 1;12:705407. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.705407.
Gennaro Pagano  1 ,  Frank G Boess  1 ,  Kirsten I Taylor  1  2 ,  Benedicte Ricci  3 ,  Brit Mollenhauer  4  5 ,  Werner Poewe  6 ,  Anne Boulay  7 ,  Judith Anzures-Cabrera  8 ,  Annamarie Vogt  1 ,  Maddalena Marchesi  3 ,  Anke Post  9 ,  Tania Nikolcheva  10 ,  Gene G Kinney  11 ,  Wagner M Zago  11 ,  Daniel K Ness  11 ,  Hanno Svoboda  1 ,  Markus Britschgi  1 ,  Susanne Ostrowitzki  10 ,  Tanya Simuni  12 ,  Kenneth Marek  13 ,  Martin Koller  11 ,  Jeff Sevigny  14 ,  Rachelle Doody  10 ,  Paulo Fontoura  10 ,  Daniel Umbricht  1 ,  Azad Bonni  1 ,  PASADENA Investigators ,  Prasinezumab Study Group
Abstract

Background: Currently available treatments for Parkinson's Disease (PD) do not slow clinical progression nor target alpha-synuclein, a key protein associated with the disease. Objective: The study objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prasinezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds aggregated alpha-synuclein, in individuals with early PD. Methods: The PASADENA study is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment study. Individuals with early PD, recruited across the US and Europe, received monthly intravenous doses of prasinezumab (1,500 or 4,500 mg) or placebo for a 52-week period (Part 1), followed by a 52-week extension (Part 2) in which all participants received active treatment. Key inclusion criteria were: aged 40-80 years; Hoehn & Yahr (H&Y) Stage I or II; time from diagnosis ≤2 years; having bradykinesia plus one other cardinal sign of PD (e.g., resting tremor, rigidity); DAT-SPECT imaging consistent with PD; and either treatment naïve or on a stable Monoamine Oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitor dose. Study design assumptions for sample size and study duration were built using a patient cohort from the Parkinson's Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI). In this report, baseline characteristics are compared between the treatment-naïve and MAO-B inhibitor-treated PASADENA cohorts and between the PASADENA and PPMI populations. Results: Of the 443 patients screened, 316 were enrolled into the PASADENA study between June 2017 and November 2018, with an average age of 59.9 years and 67.4% being male. Mean time from diagnosis at baseline was 10.11 months, with 75.3% in H&Y Stage II. Baseline motor and non-motor symptoms (assessed using Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [MDS-UPDRS]) were similar in severity between the MAO-B inhibitor-treated and treatment-naïve PASADENA cohorts (MDS-UPDRS sum of Parts I + II + III [standard deviation (SD)]; 30.21 [11.96], 32.10 [13.20], respectively). The overall PASADENA population (63.6% treatment naïve and 36.4% on MAO-B Inhibitor) showed a similar severity in MDS-UPDRS scores (e.g., MDS-UPDRS sum of Parts I + II + III [SD]; 31.41 [12.78], 32.63 [13.04], respectively) to the PPMI cohort (all treatment naïve). Conclusions: The PASADENA study population is suitable to investigate the potential of prasinezumab to slow disease progression in individuals with early PD. Trial Registration: NCT03100149.

Keywords
MDS-UPDRS = Movement Disorder Society—Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale; Parkinson's disease; Phase II clinical trial; alpha-synuclein (α-syn); disease modification treatments; disease progression; monoclonal antibodies; prasinezumab.
Products