A practical solution to pseudoreplication bias in single-cell studies
- Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 2;12(1):738. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21038-1.
- 1. Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. [email protected].
- 2. Center for Precision Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. [email protected].
- 3. Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
- 4. Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. [email protected].
- 5. Center for Precision Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. [email protected].
- 6. Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. [email protected].
Cells from the same individual share common genetic and environmental backgrounds and are not statistically independent; therefore, they are subsamples or pseudoreplicates. Thus, single-cell data have a hierarchical structure that many current single-cell methods do not address, leading to biased inference, highly inflated type 1 error rates, and reduced robustness and reproducibility. This includes methods that use a batch effect correction for individual as a means of accounting for within-sample correlation. Here, we document this dependence across a range of cell types and show that pseudo-bulk aggregation methods are conservative and underpowered relative to mixed models. To compute differential expression within a specific cell type across treatment groups, we propose applying generalized linear mixed models with a random effect for individual, to properly account for both zero inflation and the correlation structure among measures from cells within an individual. Finally, we provide power estimates across a range of experimental conditions to assist researchers in designing appropriately powered studies.