Effectiveness of Clopidogrel vs Alternative P2Y12 Inhibitors Based on the ABCD-GENE Score

  • J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Apr 16;83(15):1370-1381. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.02.015.
Cameron D Thomas  1 Francesco Franchi  2 Joseph S Rossi  3 Ellen C Keeley  4 R David Anderson  4 Amber L Beitelshees  5 Julio D Duarte  1 Luis Ortega-Paz  2 Yan Gong  1 Richard A Kerensky  4 Natasha Kulick  6 Caitrin W McDonough  1 Anh B Nguyen  7 Yehua Wang  8 Marshall Winget  7 William E Yang  5 Julie A Johnson  9 Almut G Winterstein  8 George A Stouffer  3 Dominick J Angiolillo  2 Craig R Lee  6 Larisa H Cavallari  10
Affiliations
  • 1. Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • 2. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine-Jacksonville, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
  • 3. Division of Cardiology and McAllister Heart Institute, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • 4. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • 5. Department of Medicine and Program for Personalized and Genomic Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • 6. Division of Cardiology and McAllister Heart Institute, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • 7. Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • 8. Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy and Center for Drug Evaluation and Safety, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • 9. Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
  • 10. Department of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
Abstract

Background: An ABCD-GENE (age, body mass index, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and CYP2C19 genetic variants) score ≥10 predicts reduced clopidogrel effectiveness, but its association with response to alternative therapy remains unclear.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between ABCD-GENE score and the effectiveness of clopidogrel vs alternative P2Y12 inhibitor (prasugrel or ticagrelor) therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods: A total of 4,335 patients who underwent PCI, CYP2C19 genotyping, and P2Y12 inhibitor treatment were included. The primary outcome was major atherothrombotic events (MAE) within 1 year after PCI. COX regression was performed to assess event risk in clopidogrel-treated (reference) vs alternatively treated patients, with stabilized inverse probability weights derived from exposure propensity scores after stratifying by ABCD-GENE score and further by CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LOF) genotype.

Results: Among patients with scores <10 (n = 3,200), MAE was not different with alternative therapy vs clopidogrel (weighted HR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.65-1.22; P = 0.475). The risk for MAE also did not significantly differ by treatment among patients with scores ≥10 (n = 1,135; weighted HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.51-1.11; P = 0.155). Among CYP2C19 LOF allele carriers, MAE risk appeared lower with alternative therapy in both the group with scores <10 (weighted HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.25-1.01; P = 0.052) and the group with scores ≥10 (weighted HR: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.29-0.80; P = 0.004), while there was no difference in the group with scores <10 and no LOF alleles (weighted HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.70-1.51; P = 0.885).

Conclusions: These data support the use of alternative therapy over clopidogrel in CYP2C19 LOF allele carriers after PCI, regardless of ABCD-GENE score, while clopidogrel is as effective as alternative therapy in non-LOF patients with scores <10.

Keywords
CYP2C19; clopidogrel; genetic testing; percutaneous coronary intervention; precision medicine.